Gouya Harirchi
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hans LandströmFredrik ÅströmHeidi Wiig AslesenCristina ChaminádeClaudio CozzaDaniel PittinoFrancesca VisintinGuido Bortoluzzi
- Topics
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers)Private Equity and Venture Capital (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Gouya Harirchi
9 papers receiving 475 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Management of Technology and Innovation 319
- Strategy and Management 156
- Economics and Econometrics 119
- Accounting 109
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 101
Countries citing papers authored by Gouya Harirchi
This map shows the geographic impact of Gouya Harirchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gouya Harirchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gouya Harirchi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gouya Harirchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gouya Harirchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gouya Harirchi. The network helps show where Gouya Harirchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gouya Harirchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gouya Harirchi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gouya Harirchi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gouya Harirchi. Gouya Harirchi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Innovation in the Adriatic Region | 2 |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Innovation and Entrepreneurship Studies: One or Two Fields of Research? | 1 |
| 10 | Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge basebreakdown → | 335 |
About Gouya Harirchi
Gouya Harirchi is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Business and International Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (91 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (319 citations) and Strategy and Management (156 citations). Gouya Harirchi has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hans Landström, Fredrik Åström, Heidi Wiig Aslesen, Cristina Chamináde, Claudio Cozza, Daniel Pittino, Francesca Visintin, Guido Bortoluzzi and Bernardo Balboni. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, World Development and Journal of Small Business Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.