Gottfried Schuster

402 total citations
57 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

Gottfried Schuster is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gottfried Schuster has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Biotechnology and 13 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Gottfried Schuster's work include Plant Virus Research Studies (38 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (15 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (8 papers). Gottfried Schuster is often cited by papers focused on Plant Virus Research Studies (38 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (15 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (8 papers). Gottfried Schuster collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Bulgaria and Czechia. Gottfried Schuster's co-authors include Harald Winter, Wilfried Kramer, G. Menzel, V. Kondakova, Wilfried Kramer, W. Schulze, Lothar Heinisch, Antonı́n Holý, Hermann L. Müller and R. Braun and has published in prestigious journals such as Antiviral Research, Die Naturwissenschaften and Biologia Plantarum.

In The Last Decade

Gottfried Schuster

49 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Gottfried Schuster
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Plant Science 217
  • Molecular Biology 103
  • Biotechnology 91
  • Organic Chemistry 37
  • Ecology 35
Replace E. J. Backus with:
E. J. Backus China
Greg J. Bunkers United States
Nina Heycke Germany
Samuel M. Ringel United States
Clara L. Díaz Netherlands
Rolf Beiderbeck Germany
Harald Berger Austria
Joseph S. H. Kueh United Kingdom
Clark A. Porter United States
Xuwen Hou China
E. J. Backus China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Gottfried Schuster
Gottfried Schuster · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Gottfried Schuster
Gottfried Schuster · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Gottfried Schuster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gottfried Schuster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gottfried Schuster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gottfried Schuster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gottfried Schuster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gottfried Schuster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gottfried Schuster. The network helps show where Gottfried Schuster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gottfried Schuster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gottfried Schuster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gottfried Schuster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gottfried Schuster. Gottfried Schuster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 2
4 2
5 4
6 4
7 3
8 6
9 10
10 0
11 2
12 3
13
Antiphytoviral activity of 2,4 dioxo hexahydro triazine.
41
14 12
15 11
16 3
17 12
18 9
19 6
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026