Gösta Nachman
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rostislav ZemekHenrik SkovgårdGábor L. LöveïAndy G. HoweTetsuo GotohTove HelsF.E. NwileneMohammad Shaef Ullah
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (40 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (26 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- PLoS ONECurrent BiologyPain
- Partner nations
- DenmarkJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gösta Nachman
79 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Insect Science 995
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 654
- Plant Science 534
- Ecology 508
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 361
Countries citing papers authored by Gösta Nachman
This map shows the geographic impact of Gösta Nachman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gösta Nachman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gösta Nachman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gösta Nachman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gösta Nachman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gösta Nachman. The network helps show where Gösta Nachman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gösta Nachman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gösta Nachman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gösta Nachman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gösta Nachman. Gösta Nachman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | A comparison of pollen-siring ability and life history between males and hermaphrodites of subdioecious Silene acaulis | 6 |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Gösta Nachman
Gösta Nachman is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (40 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (26 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (995 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (654 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (361 citations). Gösta Nachman has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rostislav Zemek, Henrik Skovgård, Gábor L. Löveï, Andy G. Howe, Tetsuo Gotoh, Tove Hels, F.E. Nwilene, Mohammad Shaef Ullah, Benedicte Riber Albrectsen and Jens Böcher. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Current Biology and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.