Gordon Carson
About
In The Last Decade
Gordon Carson
5 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Surgery 294
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 162
- Neurology 105
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 39
- Epidemiology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Gordon Carson
This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon Carson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon Carson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon Carson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon Carson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon Carson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon Carson. The network helps show where Gordon Carson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gordon Carson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gordon Carson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gordon Carson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gordon Carson. Gordon Carson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Listening Comprehension through Culturally Familiar Contexts: A Case Study in Japan. | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 136 | |
| 5 | 164 | |
| 6 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.