Emergency Radiology

2.2k papers and 21.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Emergency Radiology in the last decades have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Emergency Radiology usually cover Surgery (1.3k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (541 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (469 papers) specifically the topics of Radiation Dose and Imaging (282 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (240 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emergency Radiology are Joshua Broder, David M. Warshauer, Elliot K. Fishman, Robert A. Novelline, Leonard E. Swischuk, James T. Rhea, Jorge A. Soto, Aaron D. Sodickson, Ajay Singh and Stephan W. Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Emergency Radiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emergency Radiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emergency Radiology.

Countries where authors publish in Emergency Radiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emergency Radiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emergency Radiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Radiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025