Glyn Chapman
About
In The Last Decade
Glyn Chapman
7 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 278
- General Health Professions 149
- Finance 103
- Nutrition and Dietetics 89
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Glyn Chapman
This map shows the geographic impact of Glyn Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glyn Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glyn Chapman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glyn Chapman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glyn Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glyn Chapman. The network helps show where Glyn Chapman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glyn Chapman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glyn Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glyn Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glyn Chapman. Glyn Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Factors associated with Teenage pregnancy in South Asia | 31 |
| 2 | 86 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 148 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 10 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.