Jane Stephens

516 total citations
15 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Jane Stephens is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Stephens has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane Stephens's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers). Jane Stephens is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers). Jane Stephens collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Nepal and Australia. Jane Stephens's co-authors include Padam Simkhada, Edwin van Teijlingen, Phillip Good, Sue Jenkins‐Marsh, Russell Richard, Glyn Chapman, Geoffrey Beattie, Darwin Dorr, Puspa Raj Pant and Sanjeev Sharma and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American Journal of Community Psychology and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Jane Stephens

13 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Jane Stephens
Lena J. Lee United States
Mohammed A AlAteeq Saudi Arabia
Hosihn Ryu South Korea
Hugo Flores United States
Christian E. Vazquez United States
Lena J. Lee United States
Jane Stephens
Citations per year, relative to Jane Stephens Jane Stephens (= 1×) peers Lena J. Lee

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stephens. The network helps show where Jane Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Stephens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Stephens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Stephens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Stephens. Jane Stephens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Hargreaves, Anita, et al.. (2025). Impact of collaborative pharmacist prescribing on patient safety, patient flow, and pharmacists' workload. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research. 56(1). 106–114.
2.
Good, Phillip, et al.. (2014). Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(5). 45 indexed citations
3.
Good, Phillip, et al.. (2014). Medically assisted hydration for adult palliative care patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(5). CD006273–CD006273. 83 indexed citations
4.
Teijlingen, Edwin van, Padam Simkhada, & Jane Stephens. (2013). Doing Focus Groups in the Health Field: Some Lessons from Nepal. 12(1). 15–17. 3 indexed citations
5.
Teijlingen, Edwin van, et al.. (2012). Making the best use of all resources: developing a health promotion intervention in rural Nepal. Health Renaissance. 10(3). 229–235. 8 indexed citations
6.
Teijlingen, Edwin van, et al.. (2011). Antenatal Care among Women in Rural Nepal: A Community-based Study. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care. 11(2). 76–87. 9 indexed citations
7.
Regmi, Pramod, et al.. (2010). Gender Identity: Challenges to Access Social and Health Care Services for Lesbians in Nepal. Global Journal of Health Science. 2(2). 5 indexed citations
8.
9.
Chapman, Glyn, et al.. (2007). Utilisation of postnatal care among rural women in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 7(1). 19–19. 148 indexed citations
10.
Tippett, Vivienne, et al.. (2007). Expanding the scope of paramedic practice in rural and remote isolated communities. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1 indexed citations
11.
Stephens, Jane & Geoffrey Beattie. (1986). On Judging the Ends of Speaker Turns in Conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 5(2). 119–134. 19 indexed citations
12.
Stephens, Jane & Geoffrey Beattie. (1986). Turn-Taking on the Telephone: Textual Features Which Distinguish Turn-Final and Turn-Medial Utterances. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 5(3). 211–222. 7 indexed citations
13.
Dorr, Darwin, et al.. (1985). Relationship of Trait Anxiety to Self-Esteem of Children in Grades 4, 5, and 6. Psychological Reports. 57(2). 467–473. 4 indexed citations
14.
Stephens, Jane. (1985). Breezes of Discontent: A Historical Perspective of Anxiety Based Illnesses Among Women. Journal of American Culture. 8(4). 3–9.
15.
Dorr, Darwin, et al.. (1980). Use of the AML scale to identify adjustment problems in fourth‐, fifth‐, and sixth‐grade children. American Journal of Community Psychology. 8(3). 341–352. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026