Gloria Goodwin Raheja
- Anthropology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Topics
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts (10 papers)Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Historical ReviewAnnual Review of Anthropology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gloria Goodwin Raheja
13 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Anthropology 275
- Sociology and Political Science 206
- Political Science and International Relations 167
- Philosophy 68
- Gender Studies 67
Countries citing papers authored by Gloria Goodwin Raheja
This map shows the geographic impact of Gloria Goodwin Raheja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gloria Goodwin Raheja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gloria Goodwin Raheja more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gloria Goodwin Raheja
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gloria Goodwin Raheja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gloria Goodwin Raheja. The network helps show where Gloria Goodwin Raheja may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gloria Goodwin Raheja
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gloria Goodwin Raheja. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gloria Goodwin Raheja based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gloria Goodwin Raheja. Gloria Goodwin Raheja is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negotiated solidarities : gendered representations of disruption and desire in north Indian oral traditions and popular culture | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 165 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 136 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 49 |
About Gloria Goodwin Raheja
Gloria Goodwin Raheja is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 14 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (10 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (275 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (61 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (167 citations). Gloria Goodwin Raheja has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ann Grodzins Gold, Frank J. Korom, Declan Quigley and Prem Chowdhry. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and Annual Review of Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.