Glenn Drover

458 citations
22 papers · 287 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Glenn Drover

20 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Glenn Drover
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Development 35
  • Public Administration 25
  • Finance 54
  • Political Science and International Relations 114
  • Urban Studies 21
Replace Verónica Montecinos with:
Verónica Montecinos United States
Frank Nullmeier Germany
Gordon Laxer Canada
Teivo Teivainen Finland
Michel Chossudovsky Canada
John Casey United States
Francesco Duina United States
George Demartino United States
David F. Ruccio United States
Charles Simkins South Africa
Glenn Drover relative to Verónica Montecinos United States Verónica Montecinos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Verónica Montecinos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Drover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Drover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Drover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Drover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Drover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Drover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Drover. The network helps show where Glenn Drover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Glenn Drover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Glenn Drover Line = papers co-authored together Glenn Drover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199896
2
New Approaches to Welfare Theory
199343
3 200729
4 200327
5 198227
6 198011
7 199710
8
Regionalism and subregionalism in East Asia : the dynamics of China
20019
9 20015
10 20044
11 19994
12 19834
13 19833
14 19753
15 20022
16 20022
17
Welfare and Worker Participation: Eight Case-Studies
19882
18 20092
19 19882
20 19941

About Glenn Drover

Glenn Drover is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Accounting, having authored 22 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers), Canadian Policy and Governance (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper) and Political Systems and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (35 citations), Public Administration (25 citations), Finance (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (114 citations) and Urban Studies (21 citations). Glenn Drover has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Mark Hyde, John Dixon, Julia Tao, Ka-Cheong Leung, Graham Johnson, Lars Osberg, David N. Williams, David Lay Williams, Merl C. Hokenstad and David Braybrooke. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Social Policy and Society, Social Policy and Administration, Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes and Town Planning Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact