Glenda Motta

20 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Glenda Motta
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • General Health Professions 228
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 120
  • Economics and Econometrics 91
  • Rehabilitation 89
  • Clinical Psychology 76
Replace Thérèse Van Durme with:
Thérèse Van Durme Belgium
John Tingle United Kingdom
Claire Robinson United States
Cremilde Aparecida Trindade Radovanovic Brazil
Telma Ribeiro Garcia Brazil
Lesley Bainbridge Canada
Lindsey Martin United States
Anita Atwal United Kingdom
Melinda T. Neri United States
Catherine L. Rohweder United States
Glenda Motta relative to Thérèse Van Durme Belgium Thérèse Van Durme's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Thérèse Van Durme · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glenda Motta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenda Motta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenda Motta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenda Motta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenda Motta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenda Motta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenda Motta. The network helps show where Glenda Motta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenda Motta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenda Motta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenda Motta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenda Motta. Glenda Motta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2
A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Compare a Disposable, High-fluid Capacity Underpad to Nonpermeable, Disposable, Reusable Containment Products on Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Rates Among Skilled Nursing Facility Residents.
7
3 2
4 1
5 1
6
The effect of an antimicrobial drain sponge dressing on specific bacterial isolates at tracheostomy sites.
17
7
Impact of antimicrobial gauze on bacterial colonies in wounds that require packing.
49
8
Treating wound deficit using constant tension to approximate wound margins.
8
9 1
10
Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
27
11
Reimbursement challenges and how to meet them.
4
12 6
13 1
14 3
15 2
16 405
17 12
18 28
19 2
20 1

About Glenda Motta

Glenda Motta is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Medical Laboratory Technology and Rehabilitation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (4 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (71 citations), Rehabilitation (89 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (50 citations). Glenda Motta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Milne, Lisette Dunham, E. B. Smith, Maria Cândida de Carvalho Furtado, Massimo Cressoni, Paul Cozzi, Davide Chiumello, Monica Chierichetti, Federico Polli and Federica Tallarini. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association and Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026