Gisle G. Enstad

868 total citations
38 papers, 612 citations indexed

About

Gisle G. Enstad is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Gisle G. Enstad has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 612 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Computational Mechanics, 16 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 9 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Gisle G. Enstad's work include Granular flow and fluidized beds (31 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (9 papers) and Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (8 papers). Gisle G. Enstad is often cited by papers focused on Granular flow and fluidized beds (31 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (9 papers) and Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (8 papers). Gisle G. Enstad collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and Finland. Gisle G. Enstad's co-authors include M. Wójcik, J. Tejchman, Ron Zevenhoven, J. M. Rotter, Henrik Saxén, J.Y. Ooi, Tim Freeman, Harald Zetzener, Rolf K. Eckhoff and Karin Östergren and has published in prestigious journals such as Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Chemical Engineering Science and AIChE Journal.

In The Last Decade

Gisle G. Enstad

37 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gisle G. Enstad Norway 14 424 210 141 79 67 38 612
Brenda Remy United States 13 618 1.5× 342 1.6× 96 0.7× 171 2.2× 69 1.0× 14 764
Ben Freireich United States 12 457 1.1× 156 0.7× 61 0.4× 140 1.8× 67 1.0× 20 540
H. J. Feise Germany 11 265 0.6× 146 0.7× 85 0.6× 51 0.6× 35 0.5× 22 419
Harald Zetzener Germany 9 229 0.5× 187 0.9× 66 0.5× 50 0.6× 26 0.4× 20 443
Paul R. Mort United States 14 590 1.4× 355 1.7× 48 0.3× 69 0.9× 29 0.4× 41 808
J.K. Beddow United States 14 241 0.6× 243 1.2× 54 0.4× 66 0.8× 12 0.2× 40 655
Subhash C. Thakur United Kingdom 8 255 0.6× 189 0.9× 150 1.1× 83 1.1× 43 0.6× 18 447
W.A. Beverloo Netherlands 7 592 1.4× 192 0.9× 145 1.0× 197 2.5× 155 2.3× 15 828
Feras Y. Fraige Jordan 10 424 1.0× 177 0.8× 109 0.8× 147 1.9× 94 1.4× 21 575
Ingela Niklasson Björn Sweden 16 421 1.0× 180 0.9× 14 0.1× 134 1.7× 17 0.3× 27 602

Countries citing papers authored by Gisle G. Enstad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gisle G. Enstad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gisle G. Enstad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gisle G. Enstad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gisle G. Enstad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gisle G. Enstad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gisle G. Enstad. The network helps show where Gisle G. Enstad may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gisle G. Enstad

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gisle G. Enstad. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gisle G. Enstad based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gisle G. Enstad. Gisle G. Enstad is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Saxén, Henrik, et al.. (2012). Segregation of Construction Materials in Silos. Part 1: Experimental Findings on Different Scales. Particulate Science And Technology. 30(2). 145–160. 8 indexed citations
2.
Rotter, J. M., et al.. (2012). Normal pressures and frictional tractions on shallow conical hopper walls after concentric filling: Predictions and experiments. Chemical Engineering Science. 89. 264–272. 18 indexed citations
3.
Saxén, Henrik, et al.. (2012). Segregation of Construction Materials in Silos. Part 2: Identification of Relevant Segregation Mechanisms. Particulate Science And Technology. 30(2). 161–178. 7 indexed citations
4.
Saxén, Henrik, et al.. (2012). Analysis of Segregation Data for a Dry Mineral-Based Construction Materials Plant. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 51(27). 9427–9440. 2 indexed citations
5.
Saxén, Henrik, et al.. (2011). Effects of Material Properties on Segregation of Binary and Ternary Powder Mixtures in a Small Scale Cylindrical Silo. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 50(19). 11097–11108. 6 indexed citations
6.
Beck, Ralf, et al.. (2010). Influence of Crystal Properties on Powder Flow Behavior of an Aromatic Amine and L-Glutamic Acid. Particulate Science And Technology. 28(2). 146–160. 5 indexed citations
7.
Ratnayake, Chandana, et al.. (2010). Air mass balance for mass flow rate calculation in pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology. 202(1-3). 62–70. 4 indexed citations
8.
Enstad, Gisle G., et al.. (2009). Experimental and Calculated Loads on “Cone in Cone” Installations. Particulate Science And Technology. 27(4). 286–296. 3 indexed citations
9.
Ooi, J.Y., et al.. (2008). The influence of a cone-in-cone insert on flow pattern and wall pressure in a full-scale silo. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 86(4). 370–378. 52 indexed citations
10.
Enstad, Gisle G., et al.. (2007). Effects of Cyclic Loading and Various Test Conditions in an Uniaxial Tester. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. 24(4-5). 271–275. 2 indexed citations
11.
Thorpe, Rex B., et al.. (2007). Theoretical and experimental testing of a scaling rule for air current segregation of alumina powder in cylindrical silos. Powder Technology. 183(1). 133–145. 19 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, Tim, et al.. (2004). Flowability Measurements of Pharmaceutical Powder Mixtures with Poor Flow Using Five Different Techniques. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 30(7). 785–791. 71 indexed citations
13.
Enstad, Gisle G., et al.. (2003). Effect of Passive Inserts on the Granular Flow from Silos Using Numerical Solutions. Particulate Science And Technology. 21(3). 211–226. 10 indexed citations
14.
Enstad, Gisle G., et al.. (2002). Investigation of Flow Properties of Powders by Means of a Uniaxial Tester, in Relation to Direct Tablet Compression. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 28(1). 15–28. 3 indexed citations
15.
Enstad, Gisle G., et al.. (1995). Investigation of the Behaviour of Powders under and after Consolidation. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. 12(1). 16–27. 10 indexed citations
16.
Pitchumani, B., Arun Kumar Sharma, & Gisle G. Enstad. (1995). A Simplified Procedure for Flow Property Testing Using the Jenike Shear Tester. 371.
17.
Enstad, Gisle G., et al.. (1991). Investigations on the anisotropic yield behaviour of a cohesive bulk solid. Powder Technology. 64(3). 183–190. 16 indexed citations
18.
Enstad, Gisle G.. (1983). The Ultimate Critical Outlet Width for Flow in Mass Flow Hoppers. Chemie Ingenieur Technik. 55(2). 154–155. 2 indexed citations
19.
Enstad, Gisle G.. (1975). On the theory of arching in mass flow hoppers. Chemical Engineering Science. 30(10). 1273–1283. 98 indexed citations
20.
Eckhoff, Rolf K. & Gisle G. Enstad. (1975). Derivation of pacticle size distributions from measurements on plane sections through particle beds. Effect of regularity of particle packing. Powder Technology. 11(1). 1–10. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026