Gisela Feltes
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Carlos MacayaPedro Marcos‐AlbercaIván J. Núñez‐GilCarlos Almerı́aJosé Luís ZamoranoAlexandra GonçalvesJosé AgustínAntonio Fernández‐Ortíz
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (12 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers)Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Gisela Feltes
30 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 468
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 205
- Epidemiology 160
- Surgery 147
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 145
Countries citing papers authored by Gisela Feltes
This map shows the geographic impact of Gisela Feltes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gisela Feltes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gisela Feltes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gisela Feltes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gisela Feltes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gisela Feltes. The network helps show where Gisela Feltes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gisela Feltes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gisela Feltes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gisela Feltes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gisela Feltes. Gisela Feltes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Gisela Feltes
Gisela Feltes is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (12 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (468 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (205 citations) and Epidemiology (160 citations). Gisela Feltes has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Carlos Macaya, Pedro Marcos‐Alberca, Iván J. Núñez‐Gil, Carlos Almerı́a, José Luís Zamorano, Alexandra Gonçalves, José Agustín, Antonio Fernández‐Ortíz, Leopoldo Pérez de Isla and Rosana Hernández‐Antolín. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, The American Journal of Cardiology and Infection and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.