Giovanni Rubeis

706 total citations
41 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Giovanni Rubeis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Giovanni Rubeis has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Giovanni Rubeis's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers). Giovanni Rubeis is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers). Giovanni Rubeis collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Giovanni Rubeis's co-authors include Florian Steger, Andrew Sixsmith, Mei Lan Fang, Alessandra Tessitore, Federica De Galitiis, Enrico Ricevuto, Andreas Guenther, Stefano Martinotti, Paolo Marchetti and Giampiero Porzio and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Annals of Oncology and Frontiers in Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Giovanni Rubeis

36 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Giovanni Rubeis Germany 10 95 69 63 58 39 41 361
Jean‐Christophe Bélisle‐Pipon Canada 13 111 1.2× 130 1.9× 131 2.1× 60 1.0× 61 1.6× 50 512
Terika McCall United States 10 43 0.5× 62 0.9× 19 0.3× 48 0.8× 10 0.3× 27 221
Ilaria Durosini Italy 16 48 0.5× 70 1.0× 45 0.7× 74 1.3× 17 0.4× 42 657
Yoo Jung Oh United States 8 46 0.5× 132 1.9× 63 1.0× 143 2.5× 8 0.2× 25 460
Arslaan Javaeed Pakistan 11 71 0.7× 33 0.5× 10 0.2× 23 0.4× 24 0.6× 42 377
Stacey A. Tovino United States 10 90 0.9× 49 0.7× 14 0.2× 13 0.2× 9 0.2× 45 273
Tobias Haeusermann United Kingdom 7 98 1.0× 58 0.8× 22 0.3× 17 0.3× 18 0.5× 17 258
Robert Ranisch Germany 11 55 0.6× 56 0.8× 122 1.9× 18 0.3× 19 0.5× 37 446
Andria Bianchi Canada 9 44 0.5× 55 0.8× 42 0.7× 6 0.1× 28 0.7× 25 332
María José Rementeria Spain 3 61 0.6× 38 0.6× 114 1.8× 14 0.2× 42 1.1× 6 331

Countries citing papers authored by Giovanni Rubeis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giovanni Rubeis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giovanni Rubeis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giovanni Rubeis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giovanni Rubeis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giovanni Rubeis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giovanni Rubeis. The network helps show where Giovanni Rubeis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giovanni Rubeis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giovanni Rubeis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giovanni Rubeis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giovanni Rubeis. Giovanni Rubeis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rubeis, Giovanni, et al.. (2025). Integrating ethics in digital mental healthcare technologies: a principle-based empirically grounded roadmap approach. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 28(3). 411–424.
2.
Rubeis, Giovanni. (2024). Künstliche Intelligenz in der Medizin. 27(4). 132–136.
3.
Rubeis, Giovanni. (2024). Ethics of Medical AI. 3 indexed citations
4.
Rubeis, Giovanni. (2024). Grundzüge einer kritischen Medizinethik. Ethik in der Medizin. 36(2). 117–132. 1 indexed citations
5.
Woodcock, Kate, et al.. (2024). Gamified Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People: Scoping Review of Ethical Aspects During Development and Implementation. JMIR Serious Games. 12. e64488–e64488. 1 indexed citations
6.
Guenther, Andreas, et al.. (2023). Wiederbelebungsmaßnahmen bei leblosen Pflegeheimbewohnern durchführen oder unterlassen?. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin. 24(4). 190–196.
7.
Rubeis, Giovanni. (2023). Liquid Health. Medicine in the age of surveillance capitalism. Social Science & Medicine. 322. 115810–115810. 4 indexed citations
8.
Rubeis, Giovanni, et al.. (2022). Lost in translation? Conceptions of privacy and independence in the technical development of AI-based AAL. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 26(1). 99–110. 6 indexed citations
9.
Rubeis, Giovanni, Mei Lan Fang, & Andrew Sixsmith. (2022). Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics. 28(6). 49–49. 12 indexed citations
10.
Rubeis, Giovanni, et al.. (2021). Rettungsdienst im Pflegeheim – die Perspektive der Pflegefachkräfte stärken. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. 24(2). 105–106. 2 indexed citations
11.
Rubeis, Giovanni. (2020). Strange bedfellows. The unlikely alliance between artificial intelligence and narrative medicine. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 49–58. 1 indexed citations
12.
Rubeis, Giovanni. (2020). Guardians of humanity? The challenges of nursing practice in the digital age. Nursing Philosophy. 22(2). e12331–e12331. 14 indexed citations
13.
Rubeis, Giovanni, et al.. (2020). Wem nützt die App? Internet- und mobilgestützte Interventionen (IMIs) im Spannungsfeld von Autonomie und Patientenwohl. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 70(11). 467–474. 6 indexed citations
14.
Rubeis, Giovanni & Florian Steger. (2019). Internet- und mobilgestützte Interventionen bei psychischen Störungen: Implementierung in Deutschland aus ethischer Sicht. Der Nervenarzt. 90(5). 497–502. 4 indexed citations
15.
Rubeis, Giovanni & Florian Steger. (2019). Salutogenesis as empowerment. Health promotion and the role of the medical humanities. Cairn.info. N° 2(2). 75–83. 1 indexed citations
16.
Rubeis, Giovanni & Florian Steger. (2019). [Internet and mobile-assisted interventions in mental disorders : Implementation in Germany from an ethical perspective].. Der Nervenarzt. 90(5). 497–502. 5 indexed citations
17.
Rubeis, Giovanni & Florian Steger. (2019). Saving whom? The ethical challenges of harvesting tissue from savior siblings. European Journal Of Haematology. 103(5). 478–482. 2 indexed citations
18.
Rubeis, Giovanni, et al.. (2017). Patient Autonomy and Quality of Care in Telehealthcare. Science and Engineering Ethics. 24(1). 93–107. 40 indexed citations
19.
Rubeis, Giovanni, et al.. (2016). The Application of Standards and Recommendations to Clinical Ethics Consultation in Practice: An Evaluation at German Hospitals. Science and Engineering Ethics. 23(3). 793–799. 6 indexed citations
20.
Marchetti, Paolo, Katia Cannita, Enrico Ricevuto, et al.. (2003). Prognostic value of p53 molecular status in high-risk primary breast cancer. Annals of Oncology. 14(5). 704–708. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026