Gina Novick
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Lois S. SadlerHolly Powell KennedyJessica B. LewisJeannette R. IckovicsSharon Schindler RisingKathleen A. KnaflNora GroceSally S. Cohen
- Topics
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (13 papers)Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers)Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyGeneral Health ProfessionsPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Gina Novick
20 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- General Health Professions 461
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 388
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 346
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 306
- Clinical Psychology 266
Countries citing papers authored by Gina Novick
This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Novick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Novick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Novick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Novick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Novick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Novick. The network helps show where Gina Novick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gina Novick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gina Novick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gina Novick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gina Novick. Gina Novick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 78 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 122 | |
| 18 | Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?breakdown → | 923 |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Gina Novick
Gina Novick is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (13 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (306 citations), General Health Professions (461 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (346 citations). Gina Novick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lois S. Sadler, Holly Powell Kennedy, Jessica B. Lewis, Jeannette R. Ickovics, Sharon Schindler Rising, Kathleen A. Knafl, Nora Groce, Sally S. Cohen, Allecia E. Reid and Trace Kershaw. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Qualitative Health Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.