J. Michael Bowling

3.0k citations
68 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

J. Michael Bowling

66 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

J. Michael Bowling
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Applied Psychology 213
  • General Health Professions 624
  • Health 189
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 129
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 449
Replace Sharon J. Rolnick with:
Sharon J. Rolnick United States
Philip Baker Australia
Mandeep Sekhon United Kingdom
Katy Sutcliffe United Kingdom
Rikke Sand Andersen Denmark
Mark Spigt Netherlands
Wendy Lawrence United Kingdom
Jouke van der Zee Netherlands
Selina Redman Australia
David Alejandro González‐Chica Australia
J. Michael Bowling relative to Sharon J. Rolnick United States Sharon J. Rolnick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sharon J. Rolnick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Michael Bowling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Michael Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Michael Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Michael Bowling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Michael Bowling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Michael Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Michael Bowling. The network helps show where J. Michael Bowling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Michael Bowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Michael Bowling Line = papers co-authored together J. Michael Bowling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202125
2 201617
3 201662
4 20153
5 201423
6 201411
7 20137
8 20126
9 201197
10 201121
11 20118
12 201029
13 201013
14 200946
15 200920
16 200829
17 200867
18 200837
19 2006107
20 1993260

About J. Michael Bowling

J. Michael Bowling is a scholar working on Health, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Oncology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Community Health and Development (6 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (213 citations), General Health Professions (624 citations), Health (189 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (129 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (449 citations). J. Michael Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Deborah F. Tate, Dianne S. Ward, Kate Taylor, Paul A. Buescher, Kelly Webber, Susan T. Ennett, Barbara K. Rimer, Kurt M. Ribisl, Sean Hanley and Amy A. Vincus. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Public Health, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal of Adolescent Health, American Journal of Industrial Medicine and AIDS and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026