Gina Lim

52 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Gina Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biotechnology 41
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 24
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 62
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 104
  • Plant Science 128
Replace P. J. Markwell with:
P. J. Markwell United Kingdom
V. Millet France
Jerónimo Carnés Spain
Matthew Knight United States
S Oseid Norway
Daniel H. González Maglio Argentina
Heike Müller Germany
Stephen Lincoln United States
P. Bénard France
Charles Schmidt United States
Gina Lim relative to P. J. Markwell United Kingdom P. J. Markwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
P. J. Markwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Lim. The network helps show where Gina Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gina Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gina Lim Line = papers co-authored together Gina Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201543
2 202030
3 198822
4 201321
5 199520
6 201520
7 198819
8 198519
9 201618
10 201317
11 197716
12 198716
13 201815
14 198814
15 198514
16 201314
17 202013
18 198512
19 202311
20 199111

About Gina Lim

Gina Lim is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (9 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (4 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (4 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (4 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers) and Infant Nutrition and Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (41 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (24 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (62 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (104 citations) and Plant Science (128 citations). Gina Lim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hye Won Park, Isabelle Louis, Sochung Chung, T. K. Tan, Kyo Sun Kim, Soo‐Nyung Kim, Ki Soo Kim, Byong Sop Lee, Ran Lee and Sung-Hoon Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Acta Paediatrica, Journal of Korean Medical Science, Plant and Soil and World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact