Gina D. Eom
Impact in
-
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research 1
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 1
- Co-authors
- J Mazùch (1 shared paper)Ute Abraham (1 shared paper)Hans‐Dieter Volk (1 shared paper)Achim Kramer (1 shared paper)Erik D. Herzog (1 shared paper)Bert Maier (1 shared paper)Frank L. Heppner (2 shared papers)Kelly R. Miller (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Canadian Medical Association Journal (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Brain (1 paper)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gina D. Eom
5 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 496
- Biological Psychiatry 127
- Neurology 412
- Aging 53
- Physiology 528
Countries citing papers authored by Gina D. Eom
This map shows the geographic impact of Gina D. Eom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina D. Eom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina D. Eom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gina D. Eom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina D. Eom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina D. Eom. The network helps show where Gina D. Eom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gina D. Eom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A circadian clock in macrophages controls inflammatory immune responses Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 630 |
| 2 | 2013 | 364 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 168 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 |
About Gina D. Eom
Gina D. Eom is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (496 citations), Biological Psychiatry (127 citations), Neurology (412 citations), Aging (53 citations) and Physiology (528 citations). Gina D. Eom has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include J Mazùch, Ute Abraham, Hans‐Dieter Volk, Achim Kramer, Erik D. Herzog, Bert Maier, Frank L. Heppner, Kelly R. Miller, Jan Leo Rinnenthal and Grietje Krabbe. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Medical Association Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE, Brain and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.