Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.
19992.0k citationsDavid Charnock, Sasha Shepperd et al.Journal of Epidemiology & Community Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Needham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Needham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Needham more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Needham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Needham. The network helps show where Gill Needham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Needham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Needham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Needham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Needham. Gill Needham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Needham, Gill & Mohamed Ally. (2015). M-Libraries-5: from device to people. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
Needham, Gill & Mohamed Ally. (2010). M-libraries 2: A Virtual Library in Everyone's Pocket. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
5.
Virkus, Sirje, et al.. (2009). E-MOVE project - a case of successful cooperation of European academic libraries of distance teaching universities. 32(2). 4–6.1 indexed citations
Needham, Gill & Mohamed Ally. (2008). M-Libraries: Libraries on the Move to Provide Virtual Access. Medical Entomology and Zoology.21 indexed citations
Gomm, Roger, et al.. (2000). Evaluating Research in Health and Social Care. Medical Entomology and Zoology.34 indexed citations
13.
Charnock, David, Sasha Shepperd, Gill Needham, & Richard G. Gann. (1999). DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 53(2). 105–111.2014 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (1997). But will it work, Doctor? : report of a conference about promoting and supporting patient choice by making evidence about the effectiveness of health care accessible to health service users, held at the Swallow Hotel, Northampton on 22 and 23 May 1996.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
Needham, Gill, et al.. (1980). Reduction in part-time teaching : implications for schools and women teachers. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.