Gill Needham

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Gill Needham is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Information Systems and Library and Information Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Gill Needham has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Information Systems and 4 papers in Library and Information Sciences. Recurrent topics in Gill Needham's work include Web and Library Services (5 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers). Gill Needham is often cited by papers focused on Web and Library Services (5 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers). Gill Needham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Qatar. Gill Needham's co-authors include Sasha Shepperd, Richard G. Gann, David Charnock, Mohamed Ally, Roger Gomm, Peter Murray, Sandy Oliver, Laurence Alpay, Judy Thomas and Vikki Entwistle and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Health Information & Libraries Journal and Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning.

In The Last Decade

Gill Needham

18 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gill Needham United Kingdom 7 1.6k 1.0k 277 161 129 20 2.1k
David Charnock Australia 10 1.9k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 369 1.3× 194 1.2× 133 1.0× 36 2.5k
William M. Silberg 4 1.7k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 303 1.1× 154 1.0× 32 0.2× 5 2.2k
Maria Magdalena Bujnowska–Fedak Poland 15 1.0k 0.6× 386 0.4× 193 0.7× 214 1.3× 34 0.3× 57 1.7k
N. Seth Trueger United States 18 489 0.3× 614 0.6× 156 0.6× 153 1.0× 29 0.2× 47 1.3k
Tom H van de Belt Netherlands 20 634 0.4× 334 0.3× 210 0.8× 187 1.2× 22 0.2× 51 1.7k
David R. Hansberry United States 21 893 0.6× 498 0.5× 61 0.2× 115 0.7× 82 0.6× 72 1.6k
Jacqueline L. Bender Canada 21 908 0.6× 405 0.4× 520 1.9× 315 2.0× 15 0.1× 97 2.1k
Joseph A. Diaz United States 14 861 0.5× 411 0.4× 159 0.6× 155 1.0× 19 0.1× 30 1.5k
Nicola Diviani Switzerland 16 1.1k 0.7× 475 0.5× 420 1.5× 214 1.3× 14 0.1× 52 1.8k
Mark Merolli Australia 18 625 0.4× 304 0.3× 295 1.1× 353 2.2× 18 0.1× 68 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Needham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Needham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Needham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Needham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Needham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Needham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Needham. The network helps show where Gill Needham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Needham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Needham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Needham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Needham. Gill Needham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Needham, Gill & Mohamed Ally. (2015). M-Libraries-5: from device to people. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 1 indexed citations
2.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (2013). Can an excellent distance learning library service support student retention and how can we find out?. Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning. 28(2). 135–140. 4 indexed citations
3.
Ally, Mohamed & Gill Needham. (2012). M-Libraries 3: Transforming Libraries with Mobile Technology. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
4.
Needham, Gill & Mohamed Ally. (2010). M-libraries 2: A Virtual Library in Everyone's Pocket. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations
5.
Virkus, Sirje, et al.. (2009). E-MOVE project - a case of successful cooperation of European academic libraries of distance teaching universities. 32(2). 4–6. 1 indexed citations
6.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (2009). Open University Library: impact and effectiveness of information literacy interventions. Library and Information Research. 29(91).
7.
Needham, Gill & Mohamed Ally. (2008). M-Libraries: Libraries on the Move to Provide Virtual Access. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 21 indexed citations
8.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (2007). Ethical issues in providing library services to distance learners. Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning. 22(2). 117–128. 7 indexed citations
9.
Needham, Gill & Judy Thomas. (2005). A little e‐learning can go a long way in transforming a traditional print‐based distance learning course: a case study at the UK's Open University. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 22(s2). 80–84. 1 indexed citations
10.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (2005). Is a standalone IL course useful. Open Research Online (The Open University). 2 indexed citations
11.
Alpay, Laurence, Gill Needham, & Peter Murray. (2000). The potential of information technology for nurses in primary care: a review of issues and trends. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 1(1). 5–13. 7 indexed citations
12.
Gomm, Roger, et al.. (2000). Evaluating Research in Health and Social Care. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 34 indexed citations
13.
Charnock, David, Sasha Shepperd, Gill Needham, & Richard G. Gann. (1999). DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 53(2). 105–111. 2014 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (1997). But will it work, Doctor? : report of a conference about promoting and supporting patient choice by making evidence about the effectiveness of health care accessible to health service users, held at the Swallow Hotel, Northampton on 22 and 23 May 1996.. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations
15.
Oliver, Sandy, Sally Crowe, & Gill Needham. (1997). Appraising a randomized-controlled trial to enable informed choice. British Journal of Midwifery. 5(4). 228–231. 2 indexed citations
16.
Oliver, Sandy & Gill Needham. (1997). Continuity of carer what can we learn from a Cochrane review?. British Journal of Midwifery. 5(5). 292–295. 2 indexed citations
17.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (1996). Public empowerment through accessible health information.. PubMed. 84(2). 253–6. 15 indexed citations
18.
Needham, Gill. (1994). A GRiPPing yarn—getting research into practice: a case study. Health Libraries Review. 11(4). 269–277. 2 indexed citations
19.
Entwistle, Vikki, et al.. (1994). Sharing outcomes information with consumers: a new course for health librarians. Health Libraries Review. 11(4). 279–282. 3 indexed citations
20.
Needham, Gill, et al.. (1980). Reduction in part-time teaching : implications for schools and women teachers. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026