Gili Bisker
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael S. StranoAdi Hendler‐NeumarkMarkita P. LandryVerena WulfJi‐Young AhnSebastian KrussNicole M. IversonDvir Yelin
- Topics
- Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (18 papers)Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (18 papers)Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (15 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhysical Review LettersNature Communications
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Gili Bisker
75 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Biomedical Engineering 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 717
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 618
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 251
Countries citing papers authored by Gili Bisker
This map shows the geographic impact of Gili Bisker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gili Bisker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gili Bisker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gili Bisker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gili Bisker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gili Bisker. The network helps show where Gili Bisker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gili Bisker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gili Bisker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gili Bisker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gili Bisker. Gili Bisker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | Inferring broken detailed balance in the absence of observable currents | 83 |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | 101 | |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 208 | |
| 19 | 229 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Gili Bisker
Gili Bisker is a scholar working on Aging, Acoustics and Ultrasonics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (18 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (18 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (1.2k citations), Bioengineering (154 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations). Gili Bisker has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Strano, Adi Hendler‐Neumark, Markita P. Landry, Verena Wulf, Ji‐Young Ahn, Sebastian Kruss, Nicole M. Iverson, Dvir Yelin, N.A. Bakh and Seon‐Yeong Kwak. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.