Gilda Lai
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Epidemiology
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Christopher Kai-Shun LeungRobert N. WeinrebMarco YuCong YeDennis S.C. LamShu LiuDennis Shun-Chiu LamVivian Chiu
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (21 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (12 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Gilda Lai
21 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Ophthalmology 1.4k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
- Biomedical Engineering 200
- Epidemiology 93
- Molecular Biology 84
Countries citing papers authored by Gilda Lai
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilda Lai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilda Lai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilda Lai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilda Lai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilda Lai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilda Lai. The network helps show where Gilda Lai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilda Lai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilda Lai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilda Lai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gilda Lai. Gilda Lai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Comparison of test-retest variabilities of anterior segment parameters measured by two anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) – the ANTERION and the CASIA II | 1 |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | Test-retest variability of Corvis measurements in Normal and Keratoconus Eyes | 0 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 144 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 206 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 87 | |
| 17 | 102 | |
| 18 | 233 | |
| 19 | 152 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Gilda Lai
Gilda Lai is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (21 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (12 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.4k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (200 citations). Gilda Lai has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Kai-Shun Leung, Robert N. Weinreb, Marco Yu, Cong Ye, Dennis S.C. Lam, Shu Liu, Dennis Shun-Chiu Lam, Vivian Chiu, Carol Y. Cheung and Shu Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.