Chen Lin

1.6k citations
44 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Chen Lin

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Ophthalmology 356
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 295
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 315
  • Artificial Intelligence 433
  • Automotive Engineering 65
Replace Stanislav S. Makhanov with:
Stanislav S. Makhanov Thailand
Jules‐Raymond Tapamo South Africa
Philipp Seeböck Austria
Yang Wen China
Jianfeng Ren China
Chirag Patel India
Gil‐Jin Jang South Korea
Varun P. Gopi India
Ibrahem Kandel Portugal
Ümit Budak Türkiye
Chen Lin relative to Stanislav S. Makhanov Thailand Stanislav S. Makhanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Stanislav S. Makhanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen Lin. The network helps show where Chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009363
2 2016103
3 201076
4 202067
5 201857
6 202355
7 201654
8 201237
9 200334
10 202227
11 202123
12 201723
13 201722
14 201920
15 202020
16 201918
17 202014
18 202114
19 201713
20 201410

About Chen Lin

Chen Lin is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (7 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (5 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (4 papers) and Advanced Algorithms and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (356 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (295 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (315 citations), Artificial Intelligence (433 citations) and Automotive Engineering (65 citations). Chen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Qinghua Zheng, Wanyu Deng, Christopher Kai-Shun Leung, Christian Heipke, Marco Yu, Franz Rottensteiner, Robert N. Weinreb, Xuebin Xu, Gilda Lai and Vivian Chiu. Their work appears in journals such as ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, JAMA Ophthalmology and Computational Visual Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact