Gilda H. Loew
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 1%
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Robert F. KirchnerUlrich T. Mueller‐WesterhoffMichael C. ZernerDanni L. HarrisYan‐Tyng ChangHugo O. VillarJack CollinsLucy Waskell
- Topics
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (37 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (34 papers)Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (32 papers)
- Journals
- Chemical ReviewsProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Gilda H. Loew
244 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Molecular Biology 2.6k
- Materials Chemistry 1.3k
- Organic Chemistry 1.2k
- Inorganic Chemistry 1.2k
- Pharmacology 990
Countries citing papers authored by Gilda H. Loew
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilda H. Loew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilda H. Loew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilda H. Loew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilda H. Loew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilda H. Loew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilda H. Loew. The network helps show where Gilda H. Loew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilda H. Loew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilda H. Loew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilda H. Loew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gilda H. Loew. Gilda H. Loew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Gilda H. Loew
Gilda H. Loew is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Spectroscopy, having authored 259 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (37 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (34 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (990 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.2k citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (631 citations). Gilda H. Loew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Kirchner, Ulrich T. Mueller‐Westerhoff, Michael C. Zerner, Danni L. Harris, Yan‐Tyng Chang, Hugo O. Villar, Jack Collins, Lucy Waskell, Patricia A. Maguire and Marta Filizola. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.