Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India
1997482 citationsMuthiah Srinivasan, John H. Wilkins et al.British Journal of Ophthalmologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert Smolin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert Smolin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert Smolin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert Smolin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert Smolin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert Smolin. The network helps show where Gilbert Smolin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilbert Smolin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilbert Smolin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilbert Smolin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gilbert Smolin. Gilbert Smolin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smolin, Gilbert, R A Thoft, C. Stephen Foster, Dimitri T. Azar, & Claes H. Dohlman. (2005). Smolin and Thoft's the cornea : scientific foundations and clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins eBooks.83 indexed citations
Ohno, Shigeaki, et al.. (1983). The effect of K-582, a new antifungal agent, on experimental Candida keratitis.. PubMed. 24(12). 1626–9.6 indexed citations
Smolin, Gilbert, et al.. (1979). The effect of indoxole on the corneal immunologic response.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 11(2). 227–232.7 indexed citations
12.
Smolin, Gilbert, et al.. (1978). Corneal graft rejection associated with anterior iris adhesion: case report.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 10(11). 1603–4.11 indexed citations
13.
Smolin, Gilbert, et al.. (1977). Effect of systemic corticosteroids on antibody-forming cells in the eye and draining lymph nodes.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 9(11). 1417–21.1 indexed citations
Smolin, Gilbert, et al.. (1975). Changes in the antigenic composition of cultured bovine corneas.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 14(4). 295–9.6 indexed citations
16.
Smolin, Gilbert, Masao Okumoto, Richard F. Meyer, & Rubens Belfort. (1975). Effect of immunization with attenuated Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) on experimental herpetic keratitis.. PubMed. 10(3). 385–90.9 indexed citations
17.
Okumoto, Masao & Gilbert Smolin. (1974). Pneumococcal Infections of the Eye. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 77(3). 346–352.7 indexed citations
Smolin, Gilbert. (1966). Middle Cranial Fossa Meningioma. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 61(4). 798–802.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.