Gil Shapira
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Áureo de PaulaPetra ToddJed FriedmanEeshani KandpalDamien de WalqueGünther FinkTashrik AhmedChea Sanford Wesseh
- Topics
- Global Maternal and Child Health (19 papers)Healthcare Systems and Reforms (16 papers)Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Gil Shapira
34 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 155
- General Health Professions 128
- Economics and Econometrics 106
- Finance 70
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Gil Shapira
This map shows the geographic impact of Gil Shapira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gil Shapira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gil Shapira more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gil Shapira
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gil Shapira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gil Shapira. The network helps show where Gil Shapira may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gil Shapira
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gil Shapira. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gil Shapira based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gil Shapira. Gil Shapira is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | Baseline study for the impact evaluation of a Performance Based Financing (PBF) pilot in Tajikistan | 1 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Urinary incontinence in women: prevalence, characteristics and effect on quality of life. A primary care clinic study. | 22 |
About Gil Shapira
Gil Shapira is a scholar working on Finance, Safety Research and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 41 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (19 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (16 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (49 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (68 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (155 citations). Gil Shapira has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Áureo de Paula, Petra Todd, Jed Friedman, Eeshani Kandpal, Damien de Walque, Günther Fink, Tashrik Ahmed, Chea Sanford Wesseh, Petra Vergeer and Pablo Amor Fernandez. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and BMC Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.