Giada Trovini

15 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Giada Trovini
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 171
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 59
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
  • Clinical Psychology 54
Replace B. Lomas with:
B. Lomas Australia
Robert Marvin United States
Ranganathan Ram United States
Inge Winter-van Rossum Netherlands
Matthew Norris United States
Falko Biedermann Austria
Kim Maijer Netherlands
R.A. Seckinger United States
Christina Wenneberg Denmark
Tina Dam Kristensen Denmark
Giada Trovini relative to B. Lomas Australia B. Lomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
B. Lomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giada Trovini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giada Trovini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giada Trovini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giada Trovini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giada Trovini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giada Trovini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giada Trovini. The network helps show where Giada Trovini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giada Trovini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giada Trovini Line = papers co-authored together Giada Trovini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012108
2 201454
3 202034
4 201721
5 201818
6 202116
7 201415
8 201314
9 20236
10 20253
11 20233
12 20243
13 20142
14 20251
15 20251

About Giada Trovini

Giada Trovini is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (171 citations), Biological Psychiatry (14 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (59 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (35 citations) and Clinical Psychology (54 citations). Giada Trovini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paolo Girardi, Anna Comparelli, Antonella De Carolis, Valentina Corigliano, Iginia Mancinelli, Roberto Brugnoli, Roberto Tatarelli, Maurizio Pompili, Ross J. Baldessarini and Simone Di Pietro. Their work appears in journals such as Current Neuropharmacology, Schizophrenia Research, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, European Psychiatry and Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact