G.I. Stafford

3.2k citations
62 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

G.I. Stafford

60 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

G.I. Stafford
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 494
  • Pharmacology 456
  • Forestry 143
  • Plant Science 1.1k
  • Food Science 518
Replace Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz with:
Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz Brazil
Maurice M. Iwu Nigeria
Ana Maria Soares Pereira Brazil
Maique W. Biavatti Brazil
Stela Maris Kuze Rates Brazil
Nigel Gericke South Africa
Obdúlio Gomes Miguel Brazil
Isac Almeida de Medeiros Brazil
Maria de Fátima Agra Brazil
Emídio Vasconcelos Leitão da Cunha Brazil
G.I. Stafford relative to Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz Brazil Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.I. Stafford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.I. Stafford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.I. Stafford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.I. Stafford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.I. Stafford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.I. Stafford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.I. Stafford. The network helps show where G.I. Stafford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.I. Stafford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.I. Stafford Line = papers co-authored together G.I. Stafford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20228
3 20225
4 20222
5 201870
6 201730
7 201310
8 2012104
9 201113
10 20098
11 200962
12 2008183
13 200819
14 200725
15 200629
16 200553
17 200569
18 200545
19 200452
20 200484

About G.I. Stafford

G.I. Stafford is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Plant Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (20 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (16 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (12 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (11 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (7 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (494 citations), Pharmacology (456 citations), Forestry (143 citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations) and Food Science (518 citations). G.I. Stafford has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Van Staden, Anna K. Jäger, S.G. Sparg, Mikael E. Pedersen, J.F. Finnie, Catherine Fennell, E.E. Elgorashi, A.R. Ndhlala, M.E. Light and K.L. Lindsey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Planta Medica, South African Journal of Botany, International Journal of Food Science & Technology and Phytotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026