Gesine Richter

986 total citations
11 papers, 159 citations indexed

About

Gesine Richter is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gesine Richter has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Gesine Richter's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers). Gesine Richter is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers). Gesine Richter collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Netherlands. Gesine Richter's co-authors include Michael Krawczak, Alena Buyx, Christoph Borzikowsky, Stefan Schreiber, Wolfgang Lieb, Matthias Laudes, Bimba F. Hoyer, Eline M. Bunnik, Sebastian C. Semler and Amke Caliebe and has published in prestigious journals such as Genetics in Medicine, European Journal of Human Genetics and Heliyon.

In The Last Decade

Gesine Richter

11 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gesine Richter Germany 6 121 71 27 18 14 11 159
Nina Varsava United States 3 139 1.1× 67 0.9× 34 1.3× 28 1.6× 16 1.1× 14 222
Chris Krenz United States 11 171 1.4× 103 1.5× 49 1.8× 50 2.8× 11 0.8× 27 273
Katherine Gillespie United States 4 105 0.9× 62 0.9× 25 0.9× 23 1.3× 10 0.7× 7 186
Joel E. Pacyna United States 8 97 0.8× 62 0.9× 36 1.3× 25 1.4× 36 2.6× 26 206
Clive Collett United Kingdom 2 158 1.3× 66 0.9× 73 2.7× 16 0.9× 21 1.5× 2 219
Hank Greely United States 4 177 1.5× 55 0.8× 103 3.8× 31 1.7× 13 0.9× 8 236
Mette Hartlev Denmark 8 96 0.8× 33 0.5× 35 1.3× 6 0.3× 5 0.4× 23 201
Tania Moerenhout Belgium 8 49 0.4× 81 1.1× 16 0.6× 6 0.3× 4 0.3× 16 189
Lars Ursin Norway 9 162 1.3× 50 0.7× 78 2.9× 16 0.9× 6 0.4× 25 247
Mitchell Tang United States 9 77 0.6× 96 1.4× 11 0.4× 9 0.5× 30 2.1× 15 244

Countries citing papers authored by Gesine Richter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gesine Richter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gesine Richter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gesine Richter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gesine Richter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gesine Richter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gesine Richter. The network helps show where Gesine Richter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gesine Richter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gesine Richter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gesine Richter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gesine Richter. Gesine Richter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Horn, Ruth, Jennifer Merchant, Mark Bale, et al.. (2024). Ethical and social implications of public–private partnerships in the context of genomic/big health data collection. European Journal of Human Genetics. 32(6). 736–741. 4 indexed citations
2.
Richter, Gesine & Michael Krawczak. (2024). How to Elucidate Consent-Free Research Use of Medical Data: A Case for “Health Data Literacy”. JMIR Medical Informatics. 12. e51350–e51350. 1 indexed citations
3.
Richter, Gesine, et al.. (2024). Attitude towards consent-free research use of personal medical data in the general German population. Heliyon. 10(6). e27933–e27933. 5 indexed citations
4.
Lieb, Wolfgang, Christian Röder, Gunnar Jacobs, et al.. (2024). Population-Based Biobanking. Genes. 15(1). 66–66. 3 indexed citations
6.
Richter, Gesine, et al.. (2021). Consent to research participation: understanding and motivation among German pupils. BMC Medical Ethics. 22(1). 93–93. 3 indexed citations
7.
Richter, Gesine, Christoph Borzikowsky, Bimba F. Hoyer, Matthias Laudes, & Michael Krawczak. (2021). Secondary research use of personal medical data: patient attitudes towards data donation. BMC Medical Ethics. 22(1). 164–164. 23 indexed citations
8.
Richter, Gesine, Christoph Borzikowsky, Sebastian C. Semler, et al.. (2020). Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Human Genetics. 29(3). 495–502. 29 indexed citations
9.
Richter, Gesine, Christoph Borzikowsky, Wolfgang Lieb, et al.. (2019). Patient views on research use of clinical data without consent: Legal, but also acceptable?. European Journal of Human Genetics. 27(6). 841–847. 42 indexed citations
10.
Richter, Gesine, et al.. (2017). Broad consent for health care–embedded biobanking: understanding and reasons to donate in a large patient sample. Genetics in Medicine. 20(1). 76–82. 39 indexed citations
11.
Richter, Gesine & Alena Buyx. (2016). Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte. Ethik in der Medizin. 28(4). 311–325. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026