Nina Varsava

473 total citations
14 papers, 222 citations indexed

About

Nina Varsava is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Varsava has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 222 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Law, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Nina Varsava's work include Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers) and Legal principles and applications (3 papers). Nina Varsava is often cited by papers focused on Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers) and Legal principles and applications (3 papers). Nina Varsava collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Nina Varsava's co-authors include Mildred K. Cho, Stephanie A. Kraft, Sandra Soo‐Jin Lee, Kelly E. Ormond, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Katherine Gillespie, Harold S. Luft, Meghan C. Halley, Katie Gillespie and David Magnus and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Genetics in Medicine and The American Journal of Bioethics.

In The Last Decade

Nina Varsava

10 papers receiving 209 citations

Peers

Nina Varsava

PHEOH

GHP

GENET

PHYSI

EE

Katherine Gillespie United States

Joel E. Pacyna United States

Lars Ursin Norway

Clive Collett United Kingdom

Hank Greely United States

Lisa Eckstein Australia

Sabine Wöhlke Germany

Inez de Beaufort Netherlands

Arja Halkoaho Finland

Gesine Richter Germany

Katherine Gillespie United States

Nina Varsava

105 ×0.8

PHEOH

62 ×0.9

GHP

43 ×0.7

GENET

25 ×0.7

PHYSI

23 ×0.8

EE

Citations per year, relative to Nina Varsava Nina Varsava (= 1×) peers Katherine Gillespie

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Varsava

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Varsava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Varsava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Varsava more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Varsava

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Varsava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Varsava. The network helps show where Nina Varsava may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Varsava

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Varsava. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Varsava based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Varsava. Nina Varsava is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Varsava, Nina. (2021). Professional Irresponsibility and Judicial Opinions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

2.

Varsava, Nina. (2020). Precedent on Precedent. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

3.

Varsava, Nina. (2019). The Role of Dissents in the Formation of Precedent. 14(1). 285–343.

4.

Varsava, Nina. (2018). Elements of Judicial Style: A Quantitative Guide to Neil Gorsuch's Opinion Writing. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

5.

Varsava, Nina. (2018). How to Realize the Value of Stare Decisis: Options for following Precedent. Yale journal of law & the humanities. 30(2). 1. 1 indexed citations

6.

Lee, Sandra Soo‐Jin, Mildred K. Cho, Stephanie A. Kraft, et al.. (2018). “I don’t want to be Henrietta Lacks”: diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research. Genetics in Medicine. 21(1). 107–113. 64 indexed citations

7.

Wright, Megan S., et al.. (2018). Severe Brain Injury, Disability, and the Law: Achieving Justice for a Marginalized Population. Florida State University law review. 45(2). 313–382. 7 indexed citations

8.

Kraft, Stephanie A., Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, et al.. (2018). Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research. The American Journal of Bioethics. 18(4). 3–20. 140 indexed citations

9.

Varsava, Nina. (2018). What Conflicting Doctrines of Precedent Can Tell Us about Common Law Interpretation. SSRN Electronic Journal.

10.

Varsava, Nina. (2017). Options for Following Precedent. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

11.

Varsava, Nina. (2017). Dating Markets and Love Stories: Freedom and Fairness in the Pursuit of Intimacy and Love. Cultural Critique. 95. 162–162. 1 indexed citations

12.

Varsava, Nina. (2013). The Problem of Anthropomorphous Animals: Toward a Posthumanist Ethics. Society and Animals. 22(5). 520–536. 2 indexed citations

13.

Varsava, Nina. (2012). Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 167–171.

14.

Varsava, Nina. (2011). Processions of trauma in Hiroshima mon amour : Towards an ethics of representation. Studies in French Cinema. 11(2). 111–123. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact