Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Complying with Europe
2005396 citationsGerda Falkner, Oliver Treib et al.profile →
Digital sovereignty - Rhetoric and reality
202422 citationsGerda Falkner et al.Journal of European Public Policyprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Gerda Falkner Gerda Falkner (= 1×)
peers
Oliver Treib
Countries citing papers authored by Gerda Falkner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerda Falkner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerda Falkner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerda Falkner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerda Falkner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerda Falkner. The network helps show where Gerda Falkner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerda Falkner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerda Falkner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerda Falkner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gerda Falkner. Gerda Falkner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Falkner, Gerda, et al.. (2008). Aktuelle Reformvorschläge zur EU-Sozialpolitik - von der Kontroverse zum scheinbaren Konsens?. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 48(2). 201–220.
Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, Simone Leiber, & Oliver Treib. (2007). In Search of the Worlds of Compliance: Promises and Pitfalls of Quantitative Testing. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna). 113. 28.5 indexed citations
8.
Falkner, Gerda. (2004). Kontinuität und/oder Wandel?: Zahlen und Fakten zur EU-Sozialpolitik. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna). 100. 66.1 indexed citations
Falkner, Gerda. (2003). Comparing Europeanisation Effects: From Metaphor to Operationalisation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(7). 13.6 indexed citations
Falkner, Gerda. (2001). The Europeanisation of Austria: Misfit, Adaptation and Controversies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(13). 1–23.8 indexed citations
15.
Falkner, Gerda. (2001). The EU 14's "Sanctions" against Austria: Sense and Nonsense. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 14(1). 14–20.8 indexed citations
16.
Falkner, Gerda. (1999). Korporatismus auf österreichischer und europäischer Ebene: Verflechtung ohne Osmose?. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 215–240.2 indexed citations
17.
Falkner, Gerda & Wolfgang C. Müller. (1998). Österreich im europäischen Mehrebenensystem : Konsequenzen der EU-Mitgliedschaft für Politiknetzwerke und Entscheidungsprozesse. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.9 indexed citations
18.
Falkner, Gerda. (1997). Corporatist Governance and Europeanisation: No Future in the Multi-level Game?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 11–412.5 indexed citations
19.
Tálos, Emmerich & Gerda Falkner. (1996). EU-Mitglied Ödterreich : Gegenwart und Perspektiven: eine Zwischenbilanz.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.