Gerald Vision

415 citations
32 papers · 147 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Gerald Vision

26 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Gerald Vision
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • History and Philosophy of Science 45
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • Philosophy 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 32
  • General Psychology 1
Replace Michael Pendlebury with:
Michael Pendlebury South Africa
Tom Stoneham United Kingdom
Paul Cortois Belgium
N. Ángel Pinillos United States
Murali Ramachandran United Kingdom
André Gallois Australia
Imogen Dickie Canada
Derek Ball United Kingdom
Donna M. Summerfield United States
Penelope Mackie United Kingdom
Gerald Vision relative to Michael Pendlebury South Africa Michael Pendlebury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Pendlebury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerald Vision

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerald Vision's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerald Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerald Vision more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerald Vision

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerald Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerald Vision. The network helps show where Gerald Vision may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Gerald Vision, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerald Vision Line = papers co-authored together Gerald Vision links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200418
2 198518
3 199713
4 199811
5 19938
6 20117
7
Re-Emergence: Locating Conscious Properties in a Material World
20116
8 20036
9 19986
10 20055
11 19925
12 19744
13 19934
14 19793
15 20103
16 20003
17 20053
18 20173
19 20083
20 19853

About Gerald Vision

Gerald Vision is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 32 papers that have together received 147 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper) and Color Science and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations), Philosophy (75 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (32 citations) and General Psychology (1 citation). Gerald Vision has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Williamson and William Child. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The Philosophical Quarterly, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Pacific philosophical quarterly and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact