Georgia Drew

518 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Georgia Drew is a scholar working on Genetics, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Georgia Drew has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Genetics, 6 papers in Insect Science and 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Georgia Drew's work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (4 papers). Georgia Drew is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (4 papers). Georgia Drew collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Canada. Georgia Drew's co-authors include Kayla C. King, Emily J. Stevens, Gregory D. D. Hurst, Giles E. Budge, Stefanos Siozios, Crystal L. Frost, Orlando Yañez, Peter Neumann, Suzanne A. Ford and Ian P. Adams and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Reviews Microbiology, The American Naturalist and PLoS Biology.

In The Last Decade

Georgia Drew

10 papers receiving 296 citations

Hit Papers

Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite–mu... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Georgia Drew United Kingdom 7 134 88 76 74 72 10 297
Kim L. Hoang United States 10 128 1.0× 108 1.2× 65 0.9× 44 0.6× 165 2.3× 21 387
Charlotte Rafaluk‐Mohr United Kingdom 10 111 0.8× 130 1.5× 31 0.4× 50 0.7× 63 0.9× 16 270
Crystal L. Frost United Kingdom 11 357 2.7× 157 1.8× 91 1.2× 60 0.8× 89 1.2× 14 484
Sabrina Koehler Germany 8 155 1.2× 82 0.9× 99 1.3× 40 0.5× 47 0.7× 9 267
Lisa Lamberti Switzerland 4 134 1.0× 70 0.8× 34 0.4× 36 0.5× 179 2.5× 7 385
Lauri Mikonranta Finland 9 95 0.7× 119 1.4× 55 0.7× 31 0.4× 42 0.6× 12 273
Johanna R. Ohm United States 7 111 0.8× 58 0.7× 51 0.7× 66 0.9× 47 0.7× 9 286
J. Guillermo Jiménez-Cortés Mexico 12 109 0.8× 66 0.8× 118 1.6× 28 0.4× 91 1.3× 20 327
Nana Y. D. Ankrah United States 12 145 1.1× 46 0.5× 35 0.5× 87 1.2× 161 2.2× 16 411

Countries citing papers authored by Georgia Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Georgia Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georgia Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georgia Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Georgia Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georgia Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georgia Drew. The network helps show where Georgia Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georgia Drew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georgia Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georgia Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Georgia Drew. Georgia Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Stevens, Emily J., Jiandong Li, Georgia Drew, et al.. (2025). Within-host competition causes pathogen molecular evolution and perpetual microbiota dysbiosis. The ISME Journal. 19(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Drew, Georgia, et al.. (2024). Excess mortality of infected ectotherms induced by warming depends on pathogen kingdom and evolutionary history. PLoS Biology. 22(11). e3002900–e3002900. 2 indexed citations
3.
King, Kayla C., et al.. (2023). Interactions between insect vectors and plant pathogens span the parasitism–mutualism continuum. Biology Letters. 19(3). 20220453–20220453. 7 indexed citations
4.
Ford, Suzanne A., Georgia Drew, & Kayla C. King. (2022). Immune-mediated competition benefits protective microbes over pathogens in a novel host species. Heredity. 129(6). 327–335. 10 indexed citations
5.
Nadal‐Jimenez, Pol, Stefanos Siozios, Crystal L. Frost, et al.. (2022). Arsenophonus apicola sp. nov., isolated from the honeybee Apis mellifera. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY. 72(8). 14 indexed citations
6.
Preston, Gail M., et al.. (2022). Reproductive consequences of transient pathogen exposure across host genotypes and generations. Ecology and Evolution. 12(3). e8720–e8720. 4 indexed citations
7.
Drew, Georgia, Giles E. Budge, Crystal L. Frost, et al.. (2021). Transitions in symbiosis: evidence for environmental acquisition and social transmission within a clade of heritable symbionts. The ISME Journal. 15(10). 2956–2968. 25 indexed citations
8.
Drew, Georgia & Kayla C. King. (2021). More or Less? The Effect of Symbiont Density in Protective Mutualisms. The American Naturalist. 199(4). 443–454. 10 indexed citations
9.
Drew, Georgia, Emily J. Stevens, & Kayla C. King. (2021). Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite–mutualist continuum. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 19(10). 623–638. 193 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Budge, Giles E., Ian P. Adams, Richard Thwaites, et al.. (2016). Identifying bacterial predictors of honey bee health. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 141. 41–44. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026