Georges Picard
Impact in
- Plant Science top 2%
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Plant Reproductive Biology
Papers in
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 4
- Plant Reproductive Biology 4
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 4
-
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 20
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 10
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 6
- Co-authors
- Alain Bucheton (7 shared papers)Sylvette Tourmente (9 shared papers)Jean‐Marc Deragon (8 shared papers)Sylvie Tutois (7 shared papers)Fabienne Degroote (11 shared papers)Ph. L’Héritier (2 shared papers)Alain Pélisson (4 shared papers)Annie Depeiges (6 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Georges Picard
40 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Plant Science 1.0k
- Molecular Biology 866
- Genetics 327
- Aging 17
- Insect Science 84
Countries citing papers authored by Georges Picard
This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Picard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Picard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Picard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Georges Picard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Picard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Picard. The network helps show where Georges Picard may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Georges Picard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 144 | |
| 2 | 1976 | 110 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 105 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 78 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 73 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 72 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 69 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 60 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 51 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 45 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 43 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 39 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 35 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 33 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 18 |
About Georges Picard
Georges Picard is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (20 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (10 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (6 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (4 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.0k citations), Molecular Biology (866 citations), Genetics (327 citations), Aging (17 citations) and Insect Science (84 citations). Georges Picard has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alain Bucheton, Sylvette Tourmente, Jean‐Marc Deragon, Sylvie Tutois, Fabienne Degroote, Ph. L’Héritier, Alain Pélisson, Annie Depeiges, Alain Lenoir and Olivier Mathieu. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Molecular Biology, Genetics, Genetica, Nucleic Acids Research and Heredity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.