Georges Bories
- Molecular Biology
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Pharmacology
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jacques TulliezLaurent DebrauwerJean‐Pierre CravediJ.M. WalJean‐Michel WalDaniel ZalkoYvette FernandezP. Luquet
- Topics
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (12 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers)Agricultural safety and regulations (11 papers)
In The Last Decade
Georges Bories
60 papers receiving 485 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Molecular Biology 164
- Animal Science and Zoology 134
- Spectroscopy 111
- Pharmacology 78
- Biochemistry 74
Countries citing papers authored by Georges Bories
This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Bories's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Bories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Bories more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Georges Bories
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Bories. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Bories. The network helps show where Georges Bories may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georges Bories
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georges Bories. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georges Bories based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Georges Bories. Georges Bories is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as feed additive for chickens for fattening 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed | 0 |
| 4 | Updated Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed | 0 |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | [Survey of contamination of food by 3,4-benzopyrene. II. Application to the study of smoked foods]. | 1 |
| 17 | Enquête sur la contamination des aliments par le 3,4 benzopyrène. II. Application à l'étude de produits fumés. | 1 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | [Determination of 3, 4-benzopyrene in spiruline algae produced and treated by various procedures]. | 1 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Georges Bories
Georges Bories is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Biochemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 64 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (12 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers) and Agricultural safety and regulations (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (134 citations), Biochemistry (74 citations) and Spectroscopy (111 citations). Georges Bories has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Niger. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Tulliez, Laurent Debrauwer, Jean‐Pierre Cravedi, J.M. Wal, Jean‐Michel Wal, Daniel Zalko, Yvette Fernandez, P. Luquet, F. Dray and Denis E. Corpet. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.