Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to George Yúdice George Yúdice (= 1×)
peers
Iain Chambers
Countries citing papers authored by George Yúdice
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George Yúdice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Yúdice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Yúdice more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Yúdice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Yúdice. The network helps show where George Yúdice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Yúdice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Yúdice.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Yúdice based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George Yúdice. George Yúdice is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yúdice, George. (2018). NUEVAS TECNOLOGIAS, MÚSICA Y EXPERIENCIA. Acta chimica slovenica. 60(2). 442–7.1 indexed citations
2.
Yúdice, George. (2017). Postmodernity and transnational capitalism in Latin America. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 87–109.2 indexed citations
Yúdice, George. (2010). The Central American Caribbean: Rethinking Regional and National Imaginaries.1 indexed citations
5.
Yúdice, George. (2009). Cultural Diversity and Cultural Rights. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 8(5). 110–137.5 indexed citations
6.
Yúdice, George. (2008). Modelos de desarrollo cultural urbano: ¿Gentrificación o urbanismo Social?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(36). 47–61.12 indexed citations
7.
Yúdice, George. (2006). ¿Una o varias identidades?: cultura, globalización y migraciones. Nueva sociedad. 106–116.5 indexed citations
8.
Yúdice, George. (2005). The Heuristics of Contemporary Urban Art Interventions.1 indexed citations
9.
Yúdice, George. (2005). Nuevo activismo en tiempos de imperialismo. 10(18). 67–88.1 indexed citations
Yúdice, George. (1998). Posmodernidad y valores. Revista De Estudios Hispanicos. 32(2). 399–414.4 indexed citations
13.
Yúdice, George. (1996). Estudios culturales y sociedad civil. 97–112.8 indexed citations
14.
Yúdice, George. (1993). Tradiciones comparativas de estudios culturales: america latina y los estados unidos. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(5). 9–20.4 indexed citations
Yúdice, George. (1989). ¿Puede hablarse de postmodernidad en América Latina? simposio "Latinoamérica: nuevas direcciones en teoría y crítica literarias", Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, EUA, abril 1988. Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana. 15(29). 105–128.1 indexed citations
19.
Yúdice, George. (1983). Poemas de un joven que quiso ser otro. HELIN Digital Commons. 1(18). 4.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.