George Weisz
- History top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Robert FoxArthur P. MolellaChristophe CharleRobert J. SmithDonatella LippiMarco Matucci‐CerinicDavide LazzeriAndrzej Grzybowski
- Topics
- History of Medicine Studies (18 papers)Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (16 papers)Medical History and Research (10 papers)
- Journals
- JAMASHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
In The Last Decade
George Weisz
72 papers receiving 433 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- History 141
- Sociology and Political Science 89
- History and Philosophy of Science 83
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 55
- Clinical Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by George Weisz
This map shows the geographic impact of George Weisz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Weisz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Weisz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Weisz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Weisz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Weisz. The network helps show where George Weisz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Weisz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Weisz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Weisz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Weisz. George Weisz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Osteoporosis: A Future Public Health Problem for Israel? Medical and Legal Obligations. | 4 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | The academic elite and the movement to reform French higher education, 1850-1885 | 0 |
About George Weisz
George Weisz is a scholar working on Anatomy, History and Dermatology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Medicine Studies (18 papers), Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (16 papers) and Medical History and Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (83 citations), Anatomy (22 citations) and History (141 citations). George Weisz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Mongolia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Fox, Arthur P. Molella, Christophe Charle, Robert J. Smith, Donatella Lippi, Marco Matucci‐Cerinic, Davide Lazzeri, Andrzej Grzybowski, A Schramek and A Barzilai. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.