George Wadih
Impact in
- Transplantation top 1%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Nephrology top 10%
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Papers in
-
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 5
-
- Complement system in diseases 3
- Co-authors
- E. Steve Woodle (5 shared papers)Rita R. Alloway (4 shared papers)J F Silverman (2 shared papers)Prabir Roy‐Chaudhury (4 shared papers)Lois J. Arend (2 shared papers)Amit D. Tevar (2 shared papers)Paul Brailey (2 shared papers)Amit Govil (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Transplantation (4 papers)Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (1 paper)The Laryngoscope (1 paper)Transplantation Proceedings (2 papers)IDCases (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George Wadih
11 papers receiving 537 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Transplantation 299
- Nephrology 82
- Hematology 72
- Surgery 285
- Immunology 119
Countries citing papers authored by George Wadih
This map shows the geographic impact of George Wadih's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Wadih with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Wadih more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Wadih
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Wadih. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Wadih. The network helps show where George Wadih may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Wadih, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 306 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 71 | |
| 3 | Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the adrenal gland. Fifty biopsies in 48 patients. | 1992 | 52 |
| 4 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 5 | Fine needle aspiration cytology of renal and retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma. Report of two cases with cytologic findings and clinicopathologic pitfalls in diagnosis. | 1995 | 27 |
| 6 | 1989 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 1 |
About George Wadih
George Wadih is a scholar working on Transplantation, Immunology, Surgery, Neurology and Oncology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Complement system in diseases (3 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (2 papers), Head and Neck Anomalies (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (1 paper) and Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (299 citations), Nephrology (82 citations), Hematology (72 citations), Surgery (285 citations) and Immunology (119 citations). George Wadih has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. Steve Woodle, Rita R. Alloway, J F Silverman, Prabir Roy‐Chaudhury, Lois J. Arend, Amit D. Tevar, Paul Brailey, Amit Govil, Adele Rike and J Everly. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, The Laryngoscope, Transplantation Proceedings and IDCases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.