Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
1968Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)
1967Statistical Methods -6th ed.-
1957Journal of the American Statistical Association
Countries citing papers authored by George W. Snedecor
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Snedecor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Snedecor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Snedecor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Snedecor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Snedecor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Snedecor. The network helps show where George W. Snedecor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside George W. Snedecor, linked wherever they have
co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they
share.
Border = papers with George W. SnedecorLine = papers co-authored togetherGeorge W. Snedecor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.