George W. Burke
- Transplantation top 0.05%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Nephrology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Hepatology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Gaetano CiancioDavid RothJoshua MillerWarren KupinViolet EsquenaziAnne RosénJeffrey J. GaynorJunichiro Sageshima
- Topics
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (151 papers)Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (88 papers)Pancreatic function and diabetes (35 papers)
- Cited by
- TransplantationNephrologyHepatology
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical InvestigationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Internal Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
George W. Burke
288 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Transplantation 3.5k
- Surgery 3.2k
- Nephrology 1.2k
- Epidemiology 1.1k
- Hepatology 938
Countries citing papers authored by George W. Burke
This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Burke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Burke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Burke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Burke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Burke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Burke. The network helps show where George W. Burke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George W. Burke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George W. Burke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George W. Burke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George W. Burke. George W. Burke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 75 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Intra-abdominal fluid collections in pancreas transplant recipients: Bladder versus enteric drainage | 5 |
| 20 | Initial experience with OKT3 for prophylaxis and treatment of rejection in kidney, liver, and pancreas allografts | 1 |
About George W. Burke
George W. Burke is a scholar working on Transplantation, Nephrology and Hepatology, having authored 293 papers that have together received 7.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (151 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (88 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (3.5k citations), Nephrology (1.2k citations) and Hepatology (938 citations). George W. Burke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gaetano Ciancio, David Roth, Joshua Miller, Warren Kupin, Violet Esquenazi, Anne Rosén, Jeffrey J. Gaynor, Junichiro Sageshima, Adela Mattiazzi and Camillo Ricordi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.