George Thomas
- Physiology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey M. BurnsWilliam M. BrooksHeather S. AndersonJoseph E. DonnellyBenjamin CronkBarbara C. JobstJosé Maria Barbosa‐FilhoRussell H. Swerdlow
- Topics
- Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers)Berberine and alkaloids research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilCanada
In The Last Decade
George Thomas
44 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Physiology 329
- Psychiatry and Mental health 256
- Molecular Biology 204
- Cognitive Neuroscience 195
- Pharmacology 147
Countries citing papers authored by George Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of George Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Thomas. The network helps show where George Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Thomas. George Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 176 | |
| 9 | 291 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | Botanical, chemical and pharmacological investigation on Cissampelos species from Paraiba (Brazil) | 26 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | A pharmacological study of Azadirachta indica. | 4 |
About George Thomas
George Thomas is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers) and Berberine and alkaloids research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (256 citations), Pharmacology (142 citations) and Physiology (329 citations). George Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Burns, William M. Brooks, Heather S. Anderson, Joseph E. Donnelly, Benjamin Cronk, Barbara C. Jobst, José Maria Barbosa‐Filho, Russell H. Swerdlow, Robyn A. Honea and Amith Harsha. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, The Journal of Physiology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.