George Taffet

508 total citations
10 papers, 240 citations indexed

About

George Taffet is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, George Taffet has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 240 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 3 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in George Taffet's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). George Taffet is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). George Taffet collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Finland. George Taffet's co-authors include Mark L. Entman, Clemens Duerrschmid, Jeffrey R. Crawford, Sandra B. Haudek, Erin L. Reineke, JoAnn Trial, Kathryn Agarwal, Alex J. Mechaber, Elizabeth Armstrong and Harley Baker and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, Cell Metabolism and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

In The Last Decade

George Taffet

10 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George Taffet United States 7 91 76 36 25 21 10 240
Diana Delić-Brkljačić Croatia 9 108 1.2× 24 0.3× 34 0.9× 11 0.4× 85 4.0× 41 262
Flávia Nardes Brazil 5 35 0.4× 48 0.6× 12 0.3× 31 1.2× 28 1.3× 8 199
Rob E. Carpenter United States 10 52 0.6× 52 0.7× 15 0.4× 27 1.1× 93 4.4× 47 513
Ana Barettino Spain 6 102 1.1× 90 1.2× 89 2.5× 25 1.0× 29 1.4× 7 368
Danilo Obradović Germany 10 164 1.8× 54 0.7× 14 0.4× 12 0.5× 30 1.4× 28 301
Karen Lynch United States 12 30 0.3× 41 0.5× 19 0.5× 15 0.6× 94 4.5× 28 336
Mozhu Ding Sweden 12 200 2.2× 65 0.9× 33 0.9× 13 0.5× 42 2.0× 25 399
Andrew Drexler United States 10 52 0.6× 42 0.6× 36 1.0× 24 1.0× 59 2.8× 20 430
Kori A. Porosnicu Rodriguez United States 5 82 0.9× 23 0.3× 19 0.5× 51 2.0× 22 1.0× 8 218
Yingke Xu United States 10 17 0.2× 52 0.7× 35 1.0× 17 0.7× 62 3.0× 18 273

Countries citing papers authored by George Taffet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Taffet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Taffet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Taffet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Taffet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Taffet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Taffet. The network helps show where George Taffet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Taffet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Taffet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Taffet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Taffet. George Taffet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Kassie, Gizat M., et al.. (2018). Multicomponent Interventions Reduce High‐Risk Medications for Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 66(8). 1638–1645. 19 indexed citations
3.
Duerrschmid, Clemens, Jeffrey R. Crawford, Erin L. Reineke, et al.. (2013). TNF receptor 1 signaling is critically involved in mediating angiotensin-II-induced cardiac fibrosis. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 57. 59–67. 84 indexed citations
4.
Rowan, Paul J., et al.. (2013). Initiation of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in an Inpatient Setting. American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias®. 28(4). 377–383. 2 indexed citations
5.
Kerfoot, B. Price, Harley Baker, Louis N. Pangaro, et al.. (2012). An Online Spaced-Education Game to Teach and Assess Medical Students. Academic Medicine. 87(10). 1443–1449. 47 indexed citations
6.
Sano, Motoaki, Yasukatsu Izumi, Katja Helenius, et al.. (2007). Ménage-à-Trois 1 Is Critical for the Transcriptional Function of PPARγ Coactivator 1. Cell Metabolism. 5(2). 129–142. 50 indexed citations
7.
Hartley, Craig J., et al.. (1999). Functional cardiac imaging in mice using Ta–178. Nature Medicine. 5(2). 237–239. 12 indexed citations
8.
Taffet, George, et al.. (1997). Considerations Related to Disability and Exercise in Elderly Women with Congestive Heart Failure. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 11(4). 60–74. 4 indexed citations
9.
Taffet, George & Charlotte A. Tate. (1992). The MgATPase activity of rat cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum is a function of the calcium ATPase protein. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 299(2). 287–294. 6 indexed citations
10.
Taffet, George, et al.. (1989). In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Survey of Anesthesiology. 3(2). 178–178. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026