George Tackley
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Neurology top 1%
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline PalaceMark WoodhallPatrick WatersMaciej JuryńczykMaria Isabel LeiteAngela VincentSaleel ChandratreAnu Jacob
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (12 papers)Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (11 papers)Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
George Tackley
15 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
- Neurology 1.0k
- Rheumatology 492
- Molecular Biology 125
- Oncology 102
Countries citing papers authored by George Tackley
This map shows the geographic impact of George Tackley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Tackley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Tackley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Tackley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Tackley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Tackley. The network helps show where George Tackley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Tackley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Tackley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Tackley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Tackley. George Tackley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | Clinical presentation and prognosis in MOG-antibody disease: a UK study (vol 140, pg 12, 2017) | 2 |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 176 | |
| 6 | Clinical presentation and prognosis in MOG-antibody disease: a UK studybreakdown → | 481 |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 126 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | MOG cell-based assay detects non-MS patients with inflammatory neurologic diseasebreakdown → | 271 |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 74 |
About George Tackley
George Tackley is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (12 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (11 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.0k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations) and Rheumatology (492 citations). George Tackley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Palace, Mark Woodhall, Patrick Waters, Maciej Juryńczyk, Maria Isabel Leite, Angela Vincent, Saleel Chandratre, Anu Jacob, Shahd Hamid and Cheryl Hemingway. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Brain and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.