George T. Nager

2.5k total citations
49 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

George T. Nager is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, George T. Nager has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 15 papers in Oncology and 12 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in George T. Nager's work include Ear and Head Tumors (12 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (11 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (8 papers). George T. Nager is often cited by papers focused on Ear and Head Tumors (12 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (11 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (8 papers). George T. Nager collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. George T. Nager's co-authors include Lloyd B. Minor, John P. Carey, Michael Holliday, Bruce Proctor, Lawrence R. Lustig, Edward F. McCarthy, Vincent J. Hyams, Daniel N. Masica, David W. Kennedy and Herman A. Hamersma and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Neurosurgery and Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology.

In The Last Decade

George T. Nager

46 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

George T. Nager
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Neurology 638
  • Otorhinolaryngology 564
  • Surgery 562
  • Neurology 489
  • Epidemiology 438
Replace Malcolm D. Graham with:
Malcolm D. Graham United States
Stephen G. Harner United States
Galdino E. Valvassori United States
P. Bretlau Denmark
Richard J. Wiet United States
Samuel H. Selesnick United States
Sertaç Yetışer Türkiye
Gerald B. Brookes United Kingdom
Vincent Darrouzet France
Jack D. Clemis United States
Malcolm D. Graham United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to George T. Nager
George T. Nager · 1×
Citations per year, relative to George T. Nager
George T. Nager · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by George T. Nager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George T. Nager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George T. Nager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George T. Nager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George T. Nager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George T. Nager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George T. Nager. The network helps show where George T. Nager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George T. Nager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George T. Nager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George T. Nager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George T. Nager. George T. Nager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 33
2 141
3 346
4 54
5 47
6 8
7
[Follow-up of familial idiopathic dilatation of the right atrium].
4
8 66
9 15
10
[Interaction of amiodarone and digoxin].
5
11 4
12 76
13
Congenital aural atresia: an analysis of 311 cases.
45
14 2
15 29
16 16
17 5
18 27
19 6
20 32

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026