George T. Liu

769 total citations
35 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

George T. Liu is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, George T. Liu has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Surgery, 17 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 15 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in George T. Liu's work include Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (15 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (15 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (9 papers). George T. Liu is often cited by papers focused on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (15 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (15 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (9 papers). George T. Liu collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Belgium. George T. Liu's co-authors include Katherine M. Raspovic, Dane K. Wukich, Lawrence A. Lavery, Toru Nakabayashi, Liping Kong, Howard Dang, Noriyoshi Ogawa, H. Stan McGuff, N Talal and D. Guerrero and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Journal of Diabetes and its Complications.

In The Last Decade

George T. Liu

34 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George T. Liu United States 13 216 167 138 136 95 35 555
Murat Sert Türkiye 14 159 0.7× 315 1.9× 31 0.2× 20 0.1× 104 1.1× 50 642
Maurizio De Pellegrin Italy 11 264 1.2× 118 0.7× 148 1.1× 14 0.1× 46 0.5× 49 605
Ali Doğan Türkiye 14 187 0.9× 28 0.2× 63 0.5× 16 0.1× 48 0.5× 58 418
Dinç Özaksoy Türkiye 15 234 1.1× 19 0.1× 148 1.1× 42 0.3× 51 0.5× 39 517
R. Espinosa Mexico 8 264 1.2× 39 0.2× 34 0.2× 19 0.1× 27 0.3× 22 504
Atchawee Luisiri United States 14 194 0.9× 37 0.2× 16 0.1× 74 0.5× 84 0.9× 40 527
Nathaniel P. Disser United States 9 149 0.7× 27 0.2× 219 1.6× 38 0.3× 65 0.7× 11 535
P Klemp South Africa 14 272 1.3× 16 0.1× 140 1.0× 26 0.2× 41 0.4× 32 803
A G Björkengren United States 15 389 1.8× 65 0.4× 274 2.0× 37 0.3× 14 0.1× 23 654
David A. Lanning United States 14 277 1.3× 24 0.1× 29 0.2× 31 0.2× 143 1.5× 32 578

Countries citing papers authored by George T. Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George T. Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George T. Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George T. Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George T. Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George T. Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George T. Liu. The network helps show where George T. Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George T. Liu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George T. Liu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George T. Liu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George T. Liu. George T. Liu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Liu, George T., et al.. (2021). Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis: An ACS-NSQIP Database Study. Foot & Ankle Specialist. 16(3). 300–306. 7 indexed citations
3.
Ahn, Junho, Katherine M. Raspovic, George T. Liu, et al.. (2021). Are Readmission and Reoperation Rates for Lower Extremity Necrotizing Fasciitis Different Between Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus?. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 61(1). 132–138. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ahn, Junho, Paul A. Nakonezny, George T. Liu, et al.. (2020). Charcot Midfoot Reconstruction: Does Subtalar Arthrodesis or Medial Column Fixation Improve Outcomes?. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 59(6). 1219–1223. 15 indexed citations
5.
Wukich, Dane K., et al.. (2020). Biomechanical Performance of Charcot-Specific Implants. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 60(3). 440–447. 5 indexed citations
6.
Tefera, Eshetu, Paul J. Kim, George T. Liu, et al.. (2020). Charcot Reconstruction: Outcomes in Patients With and Without Diabetes. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 59(6). 1229–1233. 7 indexed citations
7.
Chang, Alice Y., Junho Ahn, Yin Xi, et al.. (2020). Short Term Radiographic and Patient Outcomes of a Biplanar Plating System for Triplanar Hallux Valgus Correction. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 60(3). 461–465. 4 indexed citations
8.
Yao, Jie, et al.. (2019). Is Routine Hardware Removal Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Tarsometatarsal Joint Fracture/Dislocation Necessary?. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 58(2). 226–230. 27 indexed citations
9.
Liu, George T., et al.. (2019). Trauma in the Diabetic Limb. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 36(3). 499–523. 4 indexed citations
10.
Liu, George T., et al.. (2019). Surgical Management of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 36(2). 173–184. 5 indexed citations
11.
Raspovic, Katherine M., et al.. (2019). Optimizing Results in Diabetic Charcot Reconstruction. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 36(3). 469–481. 7 indexed citations
12.
Liu, George T., Eric A. Gustafson, Katherine M. Raspovic, et al.. (2018). Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Characterization of Normal Anatomic Morphology and Variations of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 57(6). 1130–1136. 21 indexed citations
13.
Ahn, Junho, Michael Del Core, Dane K. Wukich, et al.. (2018). Scoring Mental Health Quality of Life With the SF-36 in Patients With and Without Diabetes Foot Complications. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 17(1). 30–35. 16 indexed citations
14.
Core, Michael Del, Junho Ahn, Dane K. Wukich, et al.. (2018). Gender Differences on SF-36 Patient-Reported Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Disease. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 17(2). 87–93. 23 indexed citations
15.
Liu, George T., et al.. (2017). A Biomechanical Analysis of Interference Screw Versus Bone Tunnel Fixation of Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfers to the Calcaneus. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 56(4). 813–816. 10 indexed citations
16.
Wang, Jia, George T. Liu, Helen Mayo, & Girish P. Joshi. (2014). Pain Management for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 54(4). 625–635. 38 indexed citations
18.
Hunt, Nathan A., George T. Liu, & Lawrence A. Lavery. (2011). The Economics of Limb Salvage in Diabetes. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 127. 289S–295S. 31 indexed citations
19.
Liu, George T., et al.. (2004). Digital syndactylization for the treatment of interdigital squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen disease). The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 43(6). 419–422. 5 indexed citations
20.
Kong, Liping, Noriyoshi Ogawa, Toru Nakabayashi, et al.. (1997). Fas and Fas ligand expression in the salivary glands of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 40(1). 87–97. 185 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026