George T. Blike
- Surgery top 5%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 1%
- Co-authors
- Joseph P. CraveroMichael L. BeachJames H. HertzogSusan GallagherJohn D. GallagherBrian D. SitesBarry GelmanJeana E. Havidich
- Topics
- Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (17 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
George T. Blike
43 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Surgery 880
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 794
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 495
- Developmental Neuroscience 397
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 349
Countries citing papers authored by George T. Blike
This map shows the geographic impact of George T. Blike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George T. Blike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George T. Blike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George T. Blike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George T. Blike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George T. Blike. The network helps show where George T. Blike may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George T. Blike
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George T. Blike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George T. Blike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George T. Blike. George T. Blike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 369 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 201 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 88 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About George T. Blike
George T. Blike is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medical Laboratory Technology and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (17 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (794 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (397 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (349 citations). George T. Blike has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Joseph P. Cravero, Michael L. Beach, James H. Hertzog, Susan Gallagher, John D. Gallagher, Brian D. Sites, Barry Gelman, Jeana E. Havidich, Susan P. McGrath and M Bertrand. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Anesthesiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.