George Poole

25 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

George Poole
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Numerical Analysis 80
  • Computational Mathematics 6
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 134
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 26
  • Geometry and Topology 41
Replace Oliver Aberth with:
Oliver Aberth United States
Frank Vallentin Netherlands
Jorma K. Merikoski Finland
Zhongyun Liu China
P. J. Eberlein United States
Zvi Ziegler Israel
D. Kershaw United Kingdom
J. H. Wells United States
Marilena Mitrouli Greece
Christine Bachoc France
George Poole relative to Oliver Aberth United States Oliver Aberth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Oliver Aberth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Poole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Poole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Poole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Poole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Poole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Poole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Poole. The network helps show where George Poole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside George Poole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Poole Line = papers co-authored together George Poole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974125
2 199221
3 200017
4 198116
5 199212
6 197210
7 198210
8 19919
9 19758
10 19748
11 19827
12 19757
13 19737
14 19796
15 19926
16 19746
17 19876
18 19884
19 20034
20 19753

About George Poole

George Poole is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (11 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (7 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (5 papers), Mathematics and Applications (5 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (4 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (3 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (3 papers) and Numerical Methods and Algorithms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (80 citations), Computational Mathematics (6 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (134 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (26 citations) and Geometry and Topology (41 citations). George Poole has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include T. L. Boullion, Stephen L. Campbell, James D. Reid, Hans‐Joachim Werner, George P. Barker, Michael Neumann, George Phillip Barker, Carl D. Meyer, Nicholas J. Rose and John E. Wetzel. Their work appears in journals such as Linear Algebra and its Applications, Discrete & Computational Geometry, Mathematics of Computation, Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra and Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact