George Philip

201 total papers · 871 total citations
63 papers, 379 citations indexed

About

George Philip is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, George Philip has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 379 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in George Philip's work include Politics and Society in Latin America (9 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (7 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers). George Philip is often cited by papers focused on Politics and Society in Latin America (9 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (7 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers). George Philip collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. George Philip's co-authors include Петерс, Francisco Panizza, Thomas E. Skidmore, Albert O. Hirschman, Robert D. Crassweller, C. E. Keen, Nick Butler, William Ascher, Karen L. Remmer and Edwin Lieuwen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and The Economic Journal.

In The Last Decade

George Philip

51 papers receiving 294 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
George Philip	122	107	71	60	39	63	379
Dirk Kohnert	59 0.5×	221 2.1×	31 0.4×	52 0.9×	4 0.1×	106	398
Philippe Faucher	101 0.8×	83 0.8×	38 0.5×	49 0.8×	2 0.1×	56	374
Gregory Albo	118 1.0×	156 1.5×	34 0.5×	27 0.5×	2 0.1×	25	344
Charles Sampford	127 1.0×	157 1.5×	8 0.1×	34 0.6×	5 0.1×	66	361
Jörg Michael Dostal	157 1.3×	109 1.0×	32 0.5×	56 0.9×		32	332
Mariana Mota Prado	119 1.0×	200 1.9×	19 0.3×	82 1.4×	5 0.1×	47	351
William Tompson	256 2.1×	96 0.9×	86 1.2×	94 1.6×		38	416
James Cameron	84 0.7×	121 1.1×	12 0.2×	47 0.8×	2 0.1×	45	373
Adam S. Harris	65 0.5×	157 1.5×	17 0.2×	51 0.8×	2 0.1×	31	405
John P. McKay	76 0.6×	107 1.0×	24 0.3×	81 1.4×	1 0.0×	52	343

Countries citing papers authored by George Philip

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Philip

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Philip. The network helps show where George Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Philip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Philip. George Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact