George Omura
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 17
- Hematology top 1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 8
- Oncology top 5%
- Lung Cancer Research Studies 6
- Genetics top 5%
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 8
-
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research 9
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 8
-
- Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 6
-
- Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations 6
George Omura
47 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Reproductive Medicine 832
- Hematology 1.0k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 533
- Oncology 619
- Genetics 240
Countries citing papers authored by George Omura
This map shows the geographic impact of George Omura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Omura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Omura more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Omura
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Omura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Omura. The network helps show where George Omura may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Omura, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 115 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 12 | Intensive Postremission Chemotherapy in Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemiabreakdown → | 1994 | 1027 |
| 13 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 16 | The influence of cytoreductive surgery on recurrence-free interval and survival in small-volume Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A gynecologic oncology group studybreakdown → | 1992 | 400 |
| 17 | 1991 | 45 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 1 |
About George Omura
George Omura is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Genetics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (17 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (9 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (8 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (6 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (6 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (832 citations), Hematology (1.0k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (533 citations). George Omura has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Brian N. Bundy, Charles A. Schiffer, Robert J. Mayer, O. Ross McIntyre, Philip Schulman, Deborah Berg, Bayard L. Powell, E Frei, Joseph O. Moore and Roger B. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.