George M. Byram
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 2%
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Topics
- Fire dynamics and safety research (5 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers)Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Global and Planetary ChangeSafety, Risk, Reliability and QualityNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George M. Byram
13 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Global and Planetary Change 396
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 153
- Ecology 85
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 75
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 56
Countries citing papers authored by George M. Byram
This map shows the geographic impact of George M. Byram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George M. Byram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George M. Byram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George M. Byram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George M. Byram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George M. Byram. The network helps show where George M. Byram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George M. Byram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George M. Byram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George M. Byram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George M. Byram. George M. Byram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forest Fuels on Organic and Associated Soils in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina | 2 |
| 2 | Atmospheric Conditions Related to Blowup Fires | 10 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | A Drought Index for Forest Fire Control | 300 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | PROJECT FIRE MODEL: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MODEL FIRES. | 7 |
| 9 | Project Fire Model - An Experimental Study of Model Fires: Final Report, June 1, 1966 | 3 |
| 10 | AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MODEL FIRES. | 15 |
| 11 | Some basic thermal processes controlling the effects of fire on living vegetation | 23 |
| 12 | Thermal properties of forest fuels | 19 |
| 13 | Thermal conductivity of some common forest fuels | 4 |
About George M. Byram
George M. Byram is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Global and Planetary Change and Soil Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire dynamics and safety research (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers) and Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (396 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (153 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (75 citations). George M. Byram has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ralph M. Nelson, Robert E. Martin, W. L. Fons, Michelle Bishop and Jack Wickstrom. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Science, Southern Medical Journal and Fire Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.