George L. Malcolm

1.7k total citations
34 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

George L. Malcolm is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, George L. Malcolm has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in George L. Malcolm's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (18 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (9 papers). George L. Malcolm is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (18 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (9 papers). George L. Malcolm collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. George L. Malcolm's co-authors include John M. Henderson, Jason J.S. Barton, Sarah Shomstein, Chris I. Baker, Tim J. Smith, Keith Rayner, Iris I. A. Groen, Antje Nuthmann, Frank Keller and Benjamin W. Tatler and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Psychological Science and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

George L. Malcolm

34 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

George L. Malcolm

CVPR

ECP

Taylor R. Hayes United States

Benjamin T. Vincent United Kingdom

Asha Iyer United States

Peter De Graef Belgium

Martin Jüttner Germany

Richard Godijn Netherlands

Anne P. Hillstrom United Kingdom

W. Joseph MacInnes Russia

Jillian H. Fecteau Canada

Joseph Krummenacher Germany

Taylor R. Hayes United States

George L. Malcolm

676 ×0.7

465 ×0.8

CVPR

182 ×0.9

209 ×1.0

ECP

213 ×1.4

Citations per year, relative to George L. Malcolm George L. Malcolm (= 1×) peers Taylor R. Hayes

Countries citing papers authored by George L. Malcolm

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George L. Malcolm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George L. Malcolm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George L. Malcolm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George L. Malcolm

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George L. Malcolm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George L. Malcolm. The network helps show where George L. Malcolm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George L. Malcolm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George L. Malcolm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George L. Malcolm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George L. Malcolm. George L. Malcolm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Clark, Allan, et al.. (2024). Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 77(11). 2151–2164. 1 indexed citations

Malcolm, George L., et al.. (2024). Predicting attentional allocation in real‐world environments: The need to investigate crossmodal semantic guidance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science. 15(3). e1675–e1675. 2 indexed citations

Wardle, Susan G., et al.. (2023). Children perceive illusory faces in objects as male more often than female. Cognition. 235. 105398–105398. 5 indexed citations

Nuthmann, Antje, et al.. (2023). Expectation-based gist facilitation: Rapid scene understanding and the role of top-down information.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 152(7). 1907–1936. 4 indexed citations

Malcolm, George L., et al.. (2022). How much is a cow like a meow? A novel database of human judgements of audiovisual semantic relatedness. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 84(4). 1317–1327. 3 indexed citations

Sheremata, Summer, George L. Malcolm, & Sarah Shomstein. (2022). Behavioral asymmetries in visual short-term memory occur in retinotopic coordinates. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 85(1). 113–119. 1 indexed citations

Malcolm, George L., et al.. (2016). Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 78(7). 2066–2078. 26 indexed citations

Malcolm, George L., Iris I. A. Groen, & Chris I. Baker. (2016). Making Sense of Real-World Scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(11). 843–856. 100 indexed citations

Malcolm, George L. & Sarah Shomstein. (2015). Object-based attention in real-world scenes.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 144(2). 257–263. 38 indexed citations

10.

Malcolm, George L., et al.. (2015). Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes. Journal of Vision. 15(2). 12–12. 18 indexed citations

11.

Coco, Moreno I., George L. Malcolm, & Frank Keller. (2014). . IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome). 22 indexed citations

12.

Malcolm, George L., et al.. (2014). How context information and target information guide the eyes from the first epoch of search in real-world scenes. Journal of Vision. 14(2). 7–7. 29 indexed citations

13.

Demiral, Şükrü Barış, George L. Malcolm, & John M. Henderson. (2012). ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: Contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing. Neuropsychologia. 50(7). 1271–1285. 42 indexed citations

14.

Malcolm, George L. & John M. Henderson. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision. 9(11). 8–8. 166 indexed citations

15.

Henderson, John M., et al.. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16(5). 850–856. 159 indexed citations

16.

Sheldon, Claire A., George L. Malcolm, & Jason J.S. Barton. (2008). Alexia With and Without Agraphia: An Assessment of Two Classical Syndromes. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 35(5). 616–624. 25 indexed citations

17.

Rayner, Keith, Tim J. Smith, George L. Malcolm, & John M. Henderson. (2008). Eye Movements and Visual Encoding During Scene Perception. Psychological Science. 20(1). 6–10. 134 indexed citations

18.

Malcolm, George L., Linda Lanyon, Andrew J.B. Fugard, & Jason J.S. Barton. (2008). Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: An exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision. 8(8). 2–2. 44 indexed citations

19.

Barton, Jason J.S., et al.. (2007). Spatial Processing in Bálint Syndrome and Prosopagnosia: A Study of Three Patients. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 27(4). 268–274. 10 indexed citations

20.

Malcolm, George L., et al.. (2004). Regional Variation in the Inversion Effect for Faces: Differential Effects for Feature Shape, Feature Configuration, and External Contour. Perception. 33(10). 1221–1231. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact