George K. Shortess

447 total citations
13 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

George K. Shortess is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts. According to data from OpenAlex, George K. Shortess has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Recurrent topics in George K. Shortess's work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). George K. Shortess is often cited by papers focused on Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). George K. Shortess collaborates with scholars based in United States. George K. Shortess's co-authors include Raǵnar Granit, Daniel Kernell, John Krauskopf, Kathleen M. Shannon and Martin L. Richter and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Physiology & Behavior and Leonardo.

In The Last Decade

George K. Shortess

7 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
George K. Shortess United States	5	219	192	102	73	35	13	345
Larry Cauller United States	8	235 1.1×	360 1.9×	40 0.4×	78 1.1×	25 0.7×	9	563
Cynthia H. Chen‐Bee United States	15	389 1.8×	467 2.4×	58 0.6×	37 0.5×	71 2.0×	18	689
Jeffrey Seely United States	6	148 0.7×	466 2.4×	88 0.9×	28 0.4×	28 0.8×	6	511
Uri Rokni Israel	7	301 1.4×	438 2.3×	67 0.7×	43 0.6×	23 0.7×	8	575
Armando Romani Switzerland	6	114 0.5×	179 0.9×	41 0.4×	31 0.4×	22 0.6×	14	296
Torstein Rudjord Norway	10	136 0.6×	150 0.8×	163 1.6×	55 0.8×	110 3.1×	14	405
Tiande Shou China	14	249 1.1×	330 1.7×	16 0.2×	247 3.4×	40 1.1×	27	583
Boris Rosin Israel	9	586 2.7×	342 1.8×	32 0.3×	81 1.1×	82 2.3×	19	839
Annelies Gerits Belgium	9	260 1.2×	253 1.3×	47 0.5×	68 0.9×	37 1.1×	13	443
Robert P. Scobey United States	14	366 1.7×	348 1.8×	11 0.1×	236 3.2×	27 0.8×	28	643

Countries citing papers authored by George K. Shortess

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George K. Shortess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George K. Shortess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George K. Shortess more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George K. Shortess

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George K. Shortess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George K. Shortess. The network helps show where George K. Shortess may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George K. Shortess

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George K. Shortess. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George K. Shortess based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George K. Shortess. George K. Shortess is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Shortess, George K.. (2023). Drawing Thought: How Drawing Helps us Observe, Discover, and Invent. Leonardo. 56(4). 441–442. 1 indexed citations

2.

Shortess, George K., et al.. (2016). Abstract or Realistic? Prototypicality of Paintings. 1 indexed citations

3.

Shortess, George K.. (2006). Art Marketing 101: A Handbook for the Fine Artist. Leonardo. 39(3). 265–265.

4.

Shortess, George K.. (2003). Leonardo Reviews. Leonardo. 36(5). 415–416.

5.

Shortess, George K., et al.. (1997). The Shape of Things: But Not the Golden Section. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 15(2). 165–176. 8 indexed citations

6.

Shortess, George K.. (1987). Interactive Sound Installations Using Microcomputers. Leonardo. 20(2). 149–149. 1 indexed citations

7.

Shortess, George K.. (1983). Neural Art: Works Based on Concepts of the Nervous System. Leonardo. 16(4). 306–306. 2 indexed citations

8.

Shortess, George K., et al.. (1977). Effects of lesions involving efferent fibers to the retina in pigeons (Columba livia)☆. Physiology & Behavior. 18(3). 409–414. 17 indexed citations

9.

Shortess, George K.. (1974). Some Physiological Limitations on Aesthetic Experience in the Visual Arts. Leonardo. 7(1). 57–57.

10.

Granit, Raǵnar, Daniel Kernell, & George K. Shortess. (1963). Quantitative aspects of repetitive firing of mammalian motoneurones, caused by injected currents. The Journal of Physiology. 168(4). 911–931. 241 indexed citations

11.

Granit, Raǵnar, Daniel Kernell, & George K. Shortess. (1963). The behaviour of mammalian motoneurones during long‐lasting orthodromic, antidromic and trans‐membrane stimulation. The Journal of Physiology. 169(4). 743–754. 25 indexed citations

12.

Shortess, George K.. (1963). Binocular Interaction in the Frog Retina*. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 53(12). 1423–1423. 2 indexed citations

13.

Shortess, George K. & John Krauskopf. (1961). Role of Involuntary Eye Movements in Stereoscopic Acuity*. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 51(5). 555–555. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact